Indiana Jones — worth the wait?
May 22nd, 2008 by Anthony Salveggi in Random ActsAfter a 19-year absence, cinema’s most famous archaeologist is back in action with Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull. So was it worth the wait?
That depends on what you’ve been waiting for.
I saw the opening midnight showing of the latest Indy flick at the Park Side cineplex. And when I, along with two packed houses, left the theater just before 2:30 a.m., one thought kept buzzing in my addled brain: “That was fucked up.”
Kingdom of the Crystal Skull seems to exist in one of those alternate comic-book universes rife with storylines written by an overly ambitious fanboy. It just so happens that the fanboy in this case is none other than George Lucas himself, the man-child responsible for all of the Indiana Jones stories. But KotCS is, in its own soberly perverted way, far removed from its predecessors in terms of tone and style, and is easily the most outlandish in concept of the series, from its gonzo premise right down to its action sequences. While the scenes of peril in Raiders of the Lost Ark were thrilling for their gee-whiz factor, I found myself watching KotCS in dumb amazement, thinking, “I can’t believe they had the balls to do this.”
And it’s no wonder, when you consider that the film, which is set in the 1950s, gives both Lucas and director Steven Spielberg carte blanche to indulge in the fantasies of their formative boyhood years, albeit filtered through the sensibilities of men in their 60s and accomplished with peerless craftsmanship. Kingdom of the Crystal Skull is a film they seem to have made for each other, their wettest cinematic wet dream for all to see.
Despite the comic-book scenario, this may be the most sober and heartwarming of the Indiana Jones movies, from its acknowledgments of mortality and the passing of time to Harrison Ford’s nuanced performance. While his characterization of Indiana Jones has long been noted for its grittiness and realism, Ford now has a grizzled, world-weary edge to him we haven’t seen before; he’s 19 years older than when we last saw him, and he acts it. The rest of the performances are also strong, particularly Shia LaBeouf as Mutt, the greaser who serves as the catalyst for the latest adventure and whose relationship with Indy is one of the linchpins of the film.
What amazes me is that most critics have praised KotCS, and not because I think the movie is a dog, — which it is not — but because it is so unlike the original trilogy, including the ways I’ve mentioned above, and in terms of Spielberg’s direction and Janusz Kaminski’s cinematography. Spielberg has been quoted on record as stating that he and Kaminski, who’ve worked together since Schindler’s List, wanted to recapture the warm, organic look achieved by cinematographer Douglas Slocombe for the first three Indy movies, but KotCS has starker, colder visuals, adding to the feeling that we’re watching an Indiana Jones movie filtered through a dream. Which is sort of the effect Kingdom of the Crystal Skull had on me, a waking dream. It was, to be sure, a surreal experience. If this is indeed the last chapter for Harrison Ford as the beloved, intrepid archaeologist, at least he went out memorably, the final scene providing a corny, old-fashioned send-off that, after all these years, feels about right.
Send to a friend:






May 22nd, 2008 at 2:53 pm
My dad is taking me and most of my local female relatives — stepmom, stepsis, step nieces, cousin — to see it tonight. I usually try not to go to movies on any normal night, and I certainly don’t go to movies on opening night — unless my dad plans one of these outings. The last one was for Harry Potter, but in his defense, he didn’t torture me by making me go the day it opened. This time it’s a different story and I’m a bit concerned about whether or not I’ll be able to handle 2+ hours of movie theater hell without becoming that person who gets all pissy at the kids who won’t shut the hell up … we shall see …
May 22nd, 2008 at 2:59 pm
Better get there early if you want everyone to sit together. I would recommend at least an hour.
Enjoy!
May 24th, 2008 at 12:56 am
i will be able to better comment once i see the flick this weekend, but i will say this now.
1) i am hard pressed to believe that the premise for KofCS is any more outlandish then Temple of Doom…
2) the stark and cold visuals probably has a lot to do with the technology available in the first series (think how LPs have that warm analogue sound compared to the cold digital 1’s and 0’s of cds)…
3) which leads to the culmination of these 2 items - increasingly unrealistic and unbeliveable (for another 19 years senior) action sequences designed for shock instead of the ol indy cool.
to parallel another trilogy that i know you can relate to, star wars (although empire runs circles around temple), the first trilogy ends with the greatest effects of the day and then a decade or two later, the next one’s leaps leave the old behind, but not in that good way.
phantom was just crap compaired to return of the jedi - i suspect the same can be said for KotCS and the super awesome last crusade.