<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Of Montreal&#8217;s Skeletal Lamping holding no. 1 slot on CMJ Top 200 for 4th week in a row</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/cribnotes/2008/12/04/of-montreals-skeletal-lamping-holding-no-1-slot-on-cmj-top-200-for-4th-week-in-a-row/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/cribnotes/2008/12/04/of-montreals-skeletal-lamping-holding-no-1-slot-on-cmj-top-200-for-4th-week-in-a-row/</link>
	<description>Stay plugged into the A with Creative Loafing&#039;s music blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 22:11:28 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: DL</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/cribnotes/2008/12/04/of-montreals-skeletal-lamping-holding-no-1-slot-on-cmj-top-200-for-4th-week-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-25794</link>
		<dc:creator>DL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 00:45:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/cribnotes/?p=3745#comment-25794</guid>
		<description>Beau. I write for another bloghere in Atlanta and I posted the same thing. I got the same e-mail today and that&#039;s just how the tour dates look in the e-mail from their publicist. Not plagiarism. Just presenting factoids. I think it is pathetic and funny that you have nothing better to do than sit around and compare blogs and write bitchy and accusatory comments. I hope that it makes you feel better about yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beau. I write for another bloghere in Atlanta and I posted the same thing. I got the same e-mail today and that&#8217;s just how the tour dates look in the e-mail from their publicist. Not plagiarism. Just presenting factoids. I think it is pathetic and funny that you have nothing better to do than sit around and compare blogs and write bitchy and accusatory comments. I hope that it makes you feel better about yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beau</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/cribnotes/2008/12/04/of-montreals-skeletal-lamping-holding-no-1-slot-on-cmj-top-200-for-4th-week-in-a-row/comment-page-1/#comment-25793</link>
		<dc:creator>Beau</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 21:04:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/cribnotes/?p=3745#comment-25793</guid>
		<description>The format for the tour dates in this post looks identical to the style used to compile tour dates on pitchforkmedia.com. You even mimic that website&#039;s use of the number sign (#). Pitchfork Media uses that and other symbols to tell the reader who the touring act is, whereas you just leave the reader wondering what that icon means. Is this a random happenstance, a freaky coincidence of style, or a case of lazy journalist and a bit of plagiarism to boot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The format for the tour dates in this post looks identical to the style used to compile tour dates on pitchforkmedia.com. You even mimic that website&#8217;s use of the number sign (#). Pitchfork Media uses that and other symbols to tell the reader who the touring act is, whereas you just leave the reader wondering what that icon means. Is this a random happenstance, a freaky coincidence of style, or a case of lazy journalist and a bit of plagiarism to boot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
