Comments on: Chunklet vs. Paste Magazine

By: Danimal

Danimal — Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:28:21 +0000

Good point, Courtney. He wouldn’t be in the lucrative businesses of promoting underground rock shows/publishing a zine if he wasn’t in it purely for personal gain.
[/sarcasm]

By the way, what the fuck is a paprika ball, and how can it be more/less punk rock than something?

By: courtney

courtney — Sun, 09 Aug 2009 07:21:53 +0000

Chunklet and Henry are about as punk rock as paprika balls! It’s obvious that the only reason he’s been in the quasi-trenches of anything is for personal gain, which is not punk rock, it’ s brat core. Just because pretentious
record labels put ads in your publication and you think your opinion matters, doesn’t mean you do. DIE! PLEASE DIE!

By: wesleywhatwhat

wesleywhatwhat — Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:35:05 +0000

pointless magazines, pointless article.

By: Harry

Harry — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 03:35:29 +0000

Different people like different things.

What a revelation.

By: Frank

Frank — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 01:31:39 +0000

I’m no carpenter, but I know a huge tool when I see one.

By: JB

JB — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 23:21:46 +0000

No, but I bet yours was….sorry to tread on your trademark…

By: j.

j. — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:41:13 +0000

JB, nice “white belt” joke. That one from 2004?

By: JB

JB — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:35:39 +0000

They both suck major white-belt wearing nads…. I’d rather eat a bucket of shit…

By: Jason

Jason — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 19:26:58 +0000

Paste is published monthly. Chunklet is published like quintannually. Shouldn’t your magazine actually be run like a magazine in order to step into this ring? Paste is straight-up dad rock these days, and Chunklet is for the music lover so narrow-minded he can’t bear to listen to anything but stand-up comedy. I’m pretty bored of both of them.

By: Mike

Mike — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 17:10:45 +0000

The real shocker is how ugly Henry is looking these days. I know he used to look bad, but this is ridiculous.