Do critics matter? Not to fans of Transformers
July 1, 2009 at 11:33 am by David Warner
As Joe Bardi pointed out last week: The critics really, really hated Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. Even Peter Travers hated it — the same Peter Travers whose effusively positive blurbage from Rolling Stone is a staple of movie ads. The avuncular Roger Ebert didn’t pull any punches, either: “A horrible experience of unbearable length,” he called it. And Joe himself begged viewers not to subject themselves to ROTF.
But subject themselves they did, in box office record-breaking numbers. In a story in today’s Washington Post, Dan Zak acknowledges that summer blockbusters have always survived in spite of critics, but observes “there’s something astounding about the gap between Transformers‘ voluminous receipts and excoriating reviews.”
“It’s not a gap — it’s a chasm. It’s interplanetary space,” says Joe Morgenstern, film critic for the Wall Street Journal, who called the sequel “appalling.” “The truth is, most summer movies these days are made to be critic-proof.”
Does this mean movie critics are irrelevant? Read the rest of Zak’s story here.
(click button for feed)
(follow us on Facebook)
(follow us on Twitter)