Hillsborough Commissioners put the county over $11,000 in the hole with every new rooftop they approve yet take a step closer to asking you to pay the highest sales tax in the state

Photo credit: Anderson Mancini @Flickr.com
I have to give Commissioner Mark Sharpe credit for promoting alternative transportation options. On its face, rail sounds like a good idea, but take a closer look at how our county currently operates and how we got here in the first place and that rail vision starts to blur.
Hillsborough County Commissioners put the county in the hole over $11,000 with every new rooftop they approve because they don’t charge adequate impact fees to developers. These figures came out in this 2007 report from the Planning Commission. As a result we are billions behind for things like roads.
What to do? They know! Ask us to tax ourselves to help pay for roads via a 1% sales tax for “rail” (of which only 37% really goes to rail). As my recent post pointed out, we wouldn’t be in this mess had this and past boards made growth pay for itself instead of shifting the burden to taxpayers to subsidize their developer welfare. Now they want even more of a bailout.
On the heels of their rail discussion Wednesday, commissioners had the chance to discuss the audit on impact fees (which are charged to developers to pay for transportation, parks, schools and fire). The audit was performed by the County Clerk’s office and presented to commissioners during their afternoon meeting. Some of the audit’s findings include:
Observation 1: The BOCC has not been assured that the impact fees were spent as directed by ordinance 96-29.
Observation 2: The current impact fee assessment for transportation, right of way, parks, and fire networks may not be covering a reasonable percentage of the cost of growth within the County.
But wait, there’s more:
Finding 1: The costs to administer the program are not fully funded by the impact fees.
Finding 3: Impact fees were incorrectly calculated and assessed.
Finding 4: Revenue from receipt of permitting fees could be lost or misappropriated.
To summarize, not only do they not charge enough to cover growth (or even the impact fee program itself), some of the money could be lost or misappropriated! If you attended or watched the meeting you wouldn’t know this because they didn’t even discuss it. Read the rest of this entry »










You probably already know that growth does not pay for itself and taxpayers are left holding the bill for things like roads, fire safety and parks despite what politicians would like you to believe. Impact fees should be funding these things, yet they don’t even come close. In fact, according to a recent audit done by the Clerk of the Circuit Court’s office, they don’t even fund the program it takes to monitor them!
Well the
You would think that when an elected body is proposing the idea to citizens to approve taxing themselves for something they might never even use that they would want to put their best foot forward. We are in Hillsborough though so keep your expectations low. Very low.
Well, that bureaucrat watch is still on for embattled County Administrator Pat Bean but she is managing to stay afloat despite some very questionable activities. Since my
As if
This is the first year I have really followed the county budget. While I have a lot of concerns about how politicians spend tax dollars I narrowed it down to the top ten for Thursday night’s final budget hearing. This is the message I delivered to the County Commission regarding my picks for wasting tax dollars:
Tampa Bay Water (TBW)
We want to know who you think should pay for Hillsborough County Commissioner Kevin White’s indiscretions: The Pimpin’ Commish himself, Kevin White, or Hillsborough County taxpayers? 









A follow up on my post about the
(click button for feed)
(follow us on Facebook)
(follow us on Twitter)