Atlanta blogs today: Friday the 13th
July 13, 2007 at 10:51 am by Andisheh Nouraee in NewsJim Marshall and John Barrow voted against the House’s resolution to surrender in Iraq.
— Erick at Peach Pundit on yesterday’s House vote to withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq by April 1, 2008. Marshall and Barrow are two of only 10 Democrats to vote against the bill.
If opposing President Bush’s war policy is surrender, I wonder what word he’d choose to describe years of congressional support for White House decisions that have unleashed chaos in Iraq while failing to weaken al-Qaeda or reduce the overall threat of terrorism.
—–
If it were up to me, I’d arrest and prosecute David McDade for a violation of O.C.G.A. 16-12-100, distribution of child pornography. And then guess what? He’d fall under O.C.G.A. 42-1-12 and have to register as a sex offender.
— Audacity criticizes Douglas County prosecutor David McDade’s distribution of a video depicting then-17-year-old Genarlow Wilson having consensual oral sex with a 15-year-old girl. On Wednesday, the federal prosecutors’ office in Atlanta called the tape child pornography and McDade’s distribution of it illegal.
—–
Having’s not holding but an open hand . . .
— Atlanta Poets Group celebrates Friday the 13th with a poem by English poet John Clare, who was born on July 13, 1793.
July 13th, 2007 at 10:59 am
Georgia’s sixth district Republican congressman, Tom Price, labels as traitor any person who dares question our Iraq strategy. Yet he and some other Republicans in congress offer no solutions and refuse to perform even the most basic oversight of President Bush and his failed war policies. All this while some of Tom Price’s contributors have made many millions of taxpayer dollars off the war and, in some cases, provided shoddy work.
Meanwhile, the Democratic leadership cannot seem to accept that—regardless of how we got there—we are in Iraq. They have not made a convincing case that an arbitrarily phased or date-certain troop withdrawal is in the best long-term interest of the United States. Rather, they seem to think that withdrawal will undo the decision to have gone to war. Rubbing President Bush’s nose in Iraq’s difficulties is also a priority.
We need bipartisan leadership that represents our country, not a particular political party. Republican Senator Brownback (R-KS) and Democratic Senator Biden (D-DE) have demonstrated their willingness to put solutions before politics. Brownback said recently that the Bush administration and Republicans are not doing enough politically in Iraq and that he and Senator Biden may introduce a bill that would call for partitioning Iraq into three states, which I strongly support.
Town Hall Challenge
Tom Price owes his constituents a thorough explanation as to why (1) he supports President Bush’s open-ended commitment to Iraq, without oversight or benchmarks, and (2) why any American who disagrees with him is guilty of treason.
Some Truths
1) Iraq is having a civil war between the Sunnis and Shiites. The Kurds will certainly join, if attacked. It may not look like a civil war, because they don’t have tanks, helicopters, and infantry; but they are fighting with what they have.
2) Vast oil revenues are a significant factor behind the fighting. Yes, there are religious and cultural differences—but concerns about how the oil revenue will be split among the three groups make the problem worse.
3) Most Iraqis support partitioning Iraq into Shiite, Sunni, and Kurdish regions. (Their current arrangement resulted from a pen stroke during the British occupation, not some organic alignment.)
4) Most citizens of the Middle East who support groups that kill and terrorize civilians—such as Hezbollah, Hamas, or al Qaeda—in part because of their aggressive stance against Israel and the United States, but also because they provide much needed social services, such as building schools.
5) Both Republican and Democratic administrations have spent decades doing business with the tyrants who run the Middle East in exchange for oil and cheap labor. This has been the one of the rallying calls of Bin Laden and Hezbollah—that we support tyrants who abuse people for profits. In fact, our latest trade deals with Oman and Jordan actually promote child and slave labor; it’s so bad the State Department had to issue warnings about rampant child trafficking in those countries.
6) Iran is using the instability in Iraq to enhance its political stature in the region. Leaving Iraq without a government that can stand up to Iran would be very destabilizing to the region and the world.
From the U.S. perspective, this is all mostly about energy. As things stand, a serious oil supply disruption would devastate our economy, threaten our security, and jeopardize our ability to provide for our children.
New Directions
Success in Iraq and the Middle East in general requires us to work in three areas simultaneously: (1) fostering a more stable Middle East region, including Iraq, (2) pursuing alternative sources of oil, and (3) developing alternatives to oil. To these ends we must:
1) Insure that the oil revenues are fairly and transparently split among all three groups: Shiite, Sunni, and Kurds based on population.
2) Allow each group to have a much stronger role in self government by creating three virtually-autonomous regions. Forcing a united Iraq down their throats is not working. Our military would then be there in support a solution that people want, rather than one they are resisting.
3) Become a genuine force for positive change, thus denying extremist groups much of their leverage. Driving a fair two-state solution to the Israeli/Palestinian problem should be our first priority. We should also engage in projects that both help the average Middle Easterner and Americans, such as supporting schools that are an alternative to the ones that teach hate and recruit terrorists. We should also stop participating in trade deals that promote child and slave labor by insisting on deals that include livable wages and basic labor rights.
4) Declare a “Marshal Plan†to end our Middle Eastern energy dependency with a compromise between exploring for new sources, reducing consumption, and developing of alternative energies. For example, we should re-establish normal relations with Cuba so we can beat China to Cuba’s off-shore oil. We should also redirect existing tax breaks for Big Oil into loan guarantees for alternative energy companies. Click here for more information.
Once we no longer need so much oil from the Middle East, we can begin winning over its people by using our oil purchases to reward positive and peaceful behavior from their leaders. This would ultimately reduce tensions and encourage prosperity in the region.
We will have to live with the threat of Islamic radical terrorism forever; but these solutions are a start to reducing the threat. Both parties have to put politics aside and put together an honest and reasonable plan that the American public understands.