Boortz was responding to critics who accuse conservative talk hosts of spouting talking points. Mr T is an example of that criticism….they spout talking points and becasue they don’t have opinions of their own.

I don’t doubt the Republicans, just like every other political party, distributes talking points. My point is that Boortz, like most of the hosts at the meeting, doesn’t follow them very well. Pretty much the ONLY thing Boortz agrees with Bush on is the war. He says repeatedly that he would vote Libertarian except he believes the foreign policy of the Libertarian Party is too dangerous and the war on Islamic terror trumps all other issues right now.

Perhaps the agreement on foreign policy is a matter of just that….agreement. Or “agreeance” as the Dufus Dems were spouting from their talking points a few years ago. Remember “gravitas”???

Nevertheless, Boortz has no business bitching about “talking points.”

1. Boortz’s foreign policy pronouncements perfectly mimic Republican talking points.

2. The rest of Neal’s Nuze is filled with ridiculous right-wing talking points that are repeated nearly verbatim on countless web sites.

Does the similarity between your statements and those of leftists I know mean you have no opinion of your own?

How is it possible, in 2007, that this is news? “Sunnis and Shias differ in doctrine, ritual, law, theology and religious organisation. It is the largest and oldest division in the history of Islam.”