<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No vibrating cock rings at CVS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/02/18/no-vibrating-cock-rings-at-cvs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/02/18/no-vibrating-cock-rings-at-cvs/</link>
	<description>Atlanta news and views, one slice at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:44:46 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/02/18/no-vibrating-cock-rings-at-cvs/comment-page-1/#comment-62563</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Feb 2008 13:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/02/18/no-vibrating-cock-rings-at-cvs/#comment-62563</guid>
		<description>maybe, but chose an example that states that.  instead you chose a law that was never passed by a republican legislature and then used a fallcious analogy.

if i could buy a pistol at cvs but not a vibrating cock ring your post would make a lot more sense.

and as much as i think it is a silly law, making it illegal to sell a cock ring at the walgreens is NOT the same thing as &quot;the right of people to enjoy consensual sexual activity in as they see fit in the privacy of their homes.&quot;

outlawing them maybe, making it illegal to sell them in the kroger pharmacy, not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>maybe, but chose an example that states that.  instead you chose a law that was never passed by a republican legislature and then used a fallcious analogy.</p>
<p>if i could buy a pistol at cvs but not a vibrating cock ring your post would make a lot more sense.</p>
<p>and as much as i think it is a silly law, making it illegal to sell a cock ring at the walgreens is NOT the same thing as &#8220;the right of people to enjoy consensual sexual activity in as they see fit in the privacy of their homes.&#8221;</p>
<p>outlawing them maybe, making it illegal to sell them in the kroger pharmacy, not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andisheh Nouraee</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/02/18/no-vibrating-cock-rings-at-cvs/comment-page-1/#comment-62412</link>
		<dc:creator>Andisheh Nouraee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:51:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/02/18/no-vibrating-cock-rings-at-cvs/#comment-62412</guid>
		<description>A stretch? You know perfectly well that our legislature values loosening gun control restrictions more than it values the right of people to enjoy consensual sexual activity as they see fit in the privacy of their homes.

Since taking control of the legislature, state Republican leaders have made a concerted effort to loosen Georgia&#039;s already quite loose gun control laws. Yet private, personal sexual conduct has received no similar attention from the so-called party of freedom and personal responsibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A stretch? You know perfectly well that our legislature values loosening gun control restrictions more than it values the right of people to enjoy consensual sexual activity as they see fit in the privacy of their homes.</p>
<p>Since taking control of the legislature, state Republican leaders have made a concerted effort to loosen Georgia&#8217;s already quite loose gun control laws. Yet private, personal sexual conduct has received no similar attention from the so-called party of freedom and personal responsibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nelly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/02/18/no-vibrating-cock-rings-at-cvs/comment-page-1/#comment-62403</link>
		<dc:creator>nelly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 21:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/02/18/no-vibrating-cock-rings-at-cvs/#comment-62403</guid>
		<description>glock rhymes with cock</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>glock rhymes with cock</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/02/18/no-vibrating-cock-rings-at-cvs/comment-page-1/#comment-62397</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 20:51:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/02/18/no-vibrating-cock-rings-at-cvs/#comment-62397</guid>
		<description>man, you guys were really stretching for your daily shot at all things right-wing today, weren&#039;t you?

by your own admission, this law predates republican control of the legislature.  and seriously, your analogy isn&#039;t even valid.  i can&#039;t by a glock in cvs either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>man, you guys were really stretching for your daily shot at all things right-wing today, weren&#8217;t you?</p>
<p>by your own admission, this law predates republican control of the legislature.  and seriously, your analogy isn&#8217;t even valid.  i can&#8217;t by a glock in cvs either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
