DIG THIS!

CL flickr

Visit our You Shoot page.

Shirley Franklin responds to CL post about her daughter

March 20, 2008 at 4:59 pm by Scott Freeman in BMF, News

Mayor Shirley Franklin responded late Tuesday night with the following comment to Mara Shalhoup’s Fresh Loaf post on the sentencing hearing for Franklin’s daughter, Kai Franklin Graham:

“Check the facts. She plead[ed] guilty to structuring which is clearly defined in the federal code. Her plea had absolutely nothing to do with any other criminal act. ANY OTHER representation by you or anyone else is FALSE. I’ve come to expect unfair, illogical and inaccurate reporting from CL. Mara, [former CL Senior Editor John Sugg] and CL have slandered me and my daughter in headlines and articles and misrepresented the facts for years to sell papers. It’s call[ed] tabloid and yellow journalism.”

Shalhoup also received a statement from Kai Franklin Graham on Tuesday night:

“On Monday, March 17, 2008 in federal court I was sentenced for structuring $14,000 in mortgage payments. Any other representation by anyone about me in this case is false and contrary to the truth.

“As proud as I am of my mother, Shirley Franklin, I believe the intense media attention has been directed to her and not me. The reporting, coverage and headlines have been sensationalized and inaccurate every step of the way in this case. The media coverage of my sentencing yesterday is no exception.

“As I stated in court, I am ready to move on with my life. By God’s grace I will be able to do so.”

We’re, of course, concerned that the mayor has accused us of “slandering” her and her daughter. The facts we reported are the same facts Mayor Franklin points to in her comment: Kai Franklin Graham pleaded guilty to making “structured financial payments” to avoid federal detection.

But to argue, as the mayor does, that her daughter’s “plea had absolutely nothing to do with any other criminal act” ignores the context of the plea. According to prosecutors, at least some of that money came from the cocaine smuggling operation run by Franklin Graham’s then-husband, Tremayne Graham. The mayor’s daughter converted that money into postal money orders in a way to avoid detection by federal officials, and she was in contact with her husband after he had jumped bail and was a fugitive, according to court documents.

Tremayne Graham has since been captured and sentenced to life in prison. He and Kai are now divorced. As part of her plea agreement, Franklin Graham agreed to cooperate with investigators involved in an ongoing probe of criminal activities associated with her ex-husband’s case.

I e-mailed the mayor and asked her to provide specific examples of when our coverage was inaccurate or unfair. She gave her permission to print her e-mailed response:

Scott,
Don’t waste my time. As senior editor that’s your job — to check the facts, to monitor for slander and to mange your coverage to the fairness standard. I’ll leave it to u to do your job.

Start with this - U have used my name, photo and references in a string of articles about criminal cases I’ve never been involved in and the court hearings, trials, facts as gathered and presented by the US Attorney and the government bear this out in their Press Release in December 2007. So if you didn’t know before you’ve known since 12/07.

Before that you had no evidence or facts to tie me to this string of cases. The US Attorney didn’t do me a favor by excluding me. They had no basis to include me and you, Mara and John have known that from your sources for years. Yet you have used my name, photograph and position and some would say high profile to sell your papers. Week after week and month after month u have chosen to describe rumors and fiction as fact. bsp; You’ve refered to Kai’s plea using scandalous words not based on court documents. Yet your reporter has an inside source and could easily determine the facts or was sitting in the courtroom for the hearing. Since she’s writing a book about the subject she must know the difference between one federal code section and another.

You’ve chosen to quote Moore without checking the facts, witness list or allegations. Most recently mixing his 2007 statements in a March 2008 article as if they applied.

The list goes on. Since you, John and Mara have chosen to take this scandalous approach to a string of cases that never included me, to defaming my daughter, I will object publicly whenever I choose. That is the value of free speech in America. It applies to u, to me and everyone else.
S Franklin

It is true that we’ve used the mayor’s photo to accompany stories about Tremayne and Kai. And we’ve identified them as her ex-son-in-law and daughter, respectively, in headlines. But so have the New York Times and other publications. That, after all, is a part of what makes this story newsworthy: A criminal drug trafficker has affected the family of a mayor of a major city. Even the U.S. attorney’s December 2007 press release that announced the plea agreement with Kai Franklin Graham is headlined “Daughter of Atlanta Mayor Pleads Guilty In S.C.”

We have never implied that the mayor is in any way involved in her ex-son-in-law’s criminal enterprise, and if someone drew that implication from our reporting that would be entirely unfair.

In fact, when one witness testified that Tremayne had bragged that his mother-in-law had pulled strings to get him out of jail on bail, we published a story that quoted the U.S. attorney saying there was no evidence that Franklin had done anything to influence his case.

We did publish a quote from Assistant U.S. Attorney Mark Moore that said investigators think the mayor’s daughter could have “critical information” about a double homicide that allegedly involved Tremayne Graham. Moore made the remark in open court in April 2007. At her plea hearing in December, Moore said Franklin Graham would be questioned as part of the ongoing investigation in Tremayne Graham’s criminal activities. Contrary to the mayor’s note, we’ve received no information to indicate that Moore’s position has changed. In fact, it was a condition of her plea agreement that she cooperate with federal investigators.

Franklin Graham was also on the original witness list for the trial of Ernest Watkins — one of her ex-husband’s drug associates — which ended when Watkins entered a guilty plea after two days of testimony. Prosecutors confirmed to CL that Franklin Graham had remained a potential witness in that case.

In double-checking our facts, Shalhoup did discover one error in her post on Franklin Graham’s plea. It said Franklin Graham deposited the $14,000 in cash she received from her then-husband in smaller installments in an attempt to evade federal reporting requirements. Actually, Franklin Graham didn’t deposit the cash; instead, she bought 10 postal money orders in increments less than $2,000 (any amount over $2,000 must be reported to the feds). She then used the money orders to pay her mortgage. That error has been corrected, but it doesn’t fundamentally alter the facts of the case.

CL respects the mayor’s point of view and we realize that any such ordeal would be painful for any family. But we stand by the story and believe our approach to it has been fair and responsible.


Send to a Friend:





Send to a friend:

15 Responses to “Shirley Franklin responds to CL post about her daughter”

  1. Dave Says:

    The Mayor of Atlanta writes to a newspaper and uses “U” for you?

  2. Mr. Peepers Says:

    Wait a minute! You’re “selling papers”, as noted multiple times by the Mayor.

    Um….. Oh boy. I think I owe you guys a LOT of money because I have been picking them up for free for over twenty years.

    Perhaps we could work out some sort of arrangement for restitution…

  3. Mr. Peepers Says:

    I could send 10 postal money orders in increments of $1,999. Will that settle us up?

  4. Mr. T Says:

    Why in the hell do you “respect” the Mayor’s point of view? Her position does not change the fact that she’s wrong.

    She’s angry about this situation - angry at her daughter’s stupidity, angry that criminals use her name in testimony, angry that media outlets rightfully explain the connection to her family, angry at the US attorney for tying the case to her in a press release - so she lashes out at the media, specifically the one paper that had the talent (and apparent temerity) to explain the entire BMF enterprise and Shirley’s daughter’s connection to it.

    Lashing out at the media is a tried and true politician’s trick because the general public tend to have as low a regard for media as they do politicians.

    Not this time Shirley. You ceased making many of us Atlantans proud in November 2006, when you refused to hold Pennington accountable for Kathryn Johnston’s murder. And you continue today with a budget deficit every bit as large as the one you decried taking over from the nefarious Bill Campbell.

    January 2010 and the end of the Franklin reign can’t get here soon enough.

  5. Mr. Peepers Says:

    Shirley, you have been pitied by Mr. T, fool!

  6. atlpaddy Says:

    Amen, Mr. T. If she is so consumed by the affairs of her daughter or securing a position in the possible Obama Administration, then she needs to step down as Mayor of Atlanta and let someone else do the job, because God knows she’s been MIA during her second term.

  7. DaleC Says:

    So the Mayor of Atlanta doesn’t know the difference between slander and libel? I know I am making distinctions of legal definitions, but I really want my mayor, or at least the PR flack who writes the press releases and official communication, to have a working knowledge of the legal concepts integral to operating the executive office of Atlanta. Someone should check the grammar, especially that last paragraph.

  8. Jen Says:

    Whatever happened to Mayor Franklin’s pothole patrol? The streets are still f’ed up.

  9. Joeventures Says:

    I know where you can get a copy of CL for half-price.

  10. Louise Bryant Park Says:

    Perhaps if part of a major city’s mayor’s daughter’s punishment for whatever bad stuff she did with real bad people’s bad money had included community service along Howell Mill Road, we might have begun to see some badly-needed attention given to this really bad traffic hell.

  11. Red Sammy Butts Says:

    Is it too late to nominate Shirley for the Lust List? That is one hot mayor!

  12. Rod Says:

    Scott

    How is defaming a family fair and responsible? CL’s exhausting coverage of this private matter is sad and sickening. Your paper continued efforts to trash the reputation of Shirley Franklin, a honest public servant who has given over 30 years of service to Atlanta, will haunt this city for decades to come. Your reporting does not uplift public debate, it doesn’t improve public policy, it only appeals to the Jerry Springer cultural disciples.

  13. Scott Freeman Says:

    Rod,

    Exactly how did we defame a family? When the son-in-law of the mayor turns out to be a major cocaine supplier who receives a life sentence, and her daughter also pleads guilty to a related charge, that is news. Do you seriously think we, or any news organization, should write about Tremayne Graham and Kai Franklin Graham without mentioning their relationship to the mayor?

    Shirley Franklin isn’t responsible for the actions of her daughter and her former son-in-law. But they are responsible for their own actions, and they each put themselves in the position of being charged with, and convicted of, federal crimes.

    But let’s not blame them; let’s blame the messenger.

  14. Rod Says:

    Scott

    The New York Times is a fair and responsible messenger. The Creative Loafing is not.

  15. mike Says:

    The facts are the facts, and I agree with the paper 100%. Kai Franklin is just as more of a convict than her ex-husband. She\\\’s fully aware of her actions and her ex hubby\\\’s actions and used her mom\\\’s fame and position to think she was above the law. The fact that the mayor is on here reading and responding speaks volumes to me. Her ex-husband (The Mayor\\\’s) was involved in the family business as well, so you are going to tell intelligent readers that the mayor had no idea what was going on in her family and under her own roof? She had to know. If you had no idea, the last thing you would do is try to convince an editor of a paper that you are being treated \\

Leave a Reply

SEARCH