Comments on: Judge: Friends of Piedmont Park must pay damages

By: wesley what what

wesley what what — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:53:19 +0000

ok, we’re in agreement on one point.

u and i (and lots of other people) think that u sound like a jerk.

actually, a condescending jerk, as u say.

By: O

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:22:23 +0000

Project much?

If I seem like a condescending jerk it’s only because I’m dealing with the likes of you, Jim, and Beth. The arguments you three have brought against the deck are ill-conceived and half thought out.

And really… name calling? Have a little self respect man.

By: wesley what what

wesley what what — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 05:48:32 +0000

“o”, i have to agree with everyone else on here (and no doubt everyone who has to deal with u in real life) – u are a sad and bitter piece of shit.

go back to your hole, douchebag.

By: O

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:12:50 +0000

Poor “wesley”

He has to sneak his tired opinions into an old thread.

anyway, the point stands – a wealthy non-profit should never have been allowed to dictate the use of public land

Truly laughable. What fucking reality do you live in? It isn’t this one.

when the CITIZENS of atlanta were so strongly against this misuse of park land.

No not “the” citizens, a few, vocal, tunnel visioned citizens.

Luckily your personal opinion counts for shit (as does mine) but justice prevails!

By: wesley what what

wesley what what — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:09:04 +0000

poor “o”.

he can’t stand when people point out how uninformed he is…

anyway, the point stands – a wealthy non-profit should never have been allowed to dictate the use of public land when the CITIZENS of atlanta were so strongly against this misuse of park land.

and of course, the FOPP lawsuit was anything but frivolous and the judge who decreed it was (among many other poor decisions) shouldn’t be holding public office.

By: Piedmont Park parking deck opponent to receive award | Fresh Loaf

Piedmont Park parking deck opponent to receive award | Fresh Loaf — Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:02:16 +0000

[...] 2008, after much heated debate and several legal skirmishes, a Fulton County Superior Court judge said Friends of Piedmont Park must pay damages to the [...]

By: Jim

Jim — Thu, 30 Oct 2008 13:04:24 +0000

Your point? What point?

You issued an inane challenge, and don’t have the sack to admit it.

By: O

Mon, 27 Oct 2008 17:06:54 +0000

Jim, poor poor Jim,

My point is that most of these bellyachers would need a big fucking sign to point out where the deck is. That crane seems to be your (temporary) sign.

As for the road? Well the Piedmont access road was already there so I’ll assume you are talking about the road that will cut across that drainage culvert behind the dog park and connect to Evelyn. Have you ever been back there?

Jim, the side you took lost. Suck it up and move on.

By: Jim

Jim — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:09:54 +0000

As I expect you’ll deny what you said, here you go:

O Says:
October 13th, 2008 at 1:38 pm

“Park user” seems pretty damned uninformed. I’d recommend “Park user” take a look at the plans on the FOPP site and then actually go to the park and see if he can even find the construction site.

Maybe you should have gone to the park first, then you might have noticed the crane and not made such an asinine challenge…

By: Jim

Jim — Mon, 27 Oct 2008 13:06:40 +0000

This was your challenge, remember?

You said ‘go to the park now and you will be unable to find the location of the deck.’

I merely pointed out that the crane is a bit of a giveaway….Maybe you should visit the park…

And when the crane is gone? I think the new road might also be a bit of a give-away…