<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Political blogger Andre Walker&#8217;s conflict of interest?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/</link>
	<description>Atlanta news and views, one slice at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:26:49 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Being Amber Rhea &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top 10 blog topics of 2008</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-101708</link>
		<dc:creator>Being Amber Rhea &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Top 10 blog topics of 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 03:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/#comment-101708</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;ethics&#8221; - that were suddenly being tossed around by the likes of Ken Edelstein. Andre&#8217;s actions apparently served as an indictment of all bloggers (stop me if you&#8217;ve [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8220;ethics&#8221; &#8211; that were suddenly being tossed around by the likes of Ken Edelstein. Andre&#8217;s actions apparently served as an indictment of all bloggers (stop me if you&#8217;ve [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Freeman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-87476</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Freeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 20:10:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/#comment-87476</guid>
		<description>I totally agree, Griftdrift. Saying the FEC filings were his disclosure is rather lame. He should&#039;ve been open and upfront about the conflict, as in adding a disclosure to any post he authored about Scott. I also wish he would offer a detailed response to all this on his blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree, Griftdrift. Saying the FEC filings were his disclosure is rather lame. He should&#8217;ve been open and upfront about the conflict, as in adding a disclosure to any post he authored about Scott. I also wish he would offer a detailed response to all this on his blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: griftdrift</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-87473</link>
		<dc:creator>griftdrift</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/#comment-87473</guid>
		<description>Which still does not mitigate the fact that Andre took money from a campaign, wrote positively about that candidate and never disclosed it to his readers.

It doesn&#039;t how questionable the ethics of the source are (and we&#039;ve had no response from them yet), if the facts are as presented what Andre did was unethical. End of story.

But hey, nice effort at deflection. Always a useful strategy for campaign operatives. For people who believe in ethics and honesty in their writing? Not so much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which still does not mitigate the fact that Andre took money from a campaign, wrote positively about that candidate and never disclosed it to his readers.</p>
<p>It doesn&#8217;t how questionable the ethics of the source are (and we&#8217;ve had no response from them yet), if the facts are as presented what Andre did was unethical. End of story.</p>
<p>But hey, nice effort at deflection. Always a useful strategy for campaign operatives. For people who believe in ethics and honesty in their writing? Not so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ned</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-87472</link>
		<dc:creator>Ned</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 19:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/#comment-87472</guid>
		<description>While not excusing Walker, it seems to me two sources of information - one that presents itself as &quot;News&quot; and the other that contains the opinions of the author - supported two different candidates in the same race.

Atlanta Progressive &quot;News&quot; was fond of writing hit pieces on David Scott while endorsing Donzella James for a $280 fee from the James campaign.

Georgia Politics Unfiltered did the reverse. Andre Walker accepted money to write glowingly of Scott.

The difference? The Georgia Politics Unfiltered candidate won. The Atlanta Progressive &quot;News&quot; candidate lost.

The only question is, did &quot;Able&quot; Mable Thomas get her money&#039;s worth from Atlanta Progressive &quot;News&quot; considering the thrashing she got from John Lewis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While not excusing Walker, it seems to me two sources of information &#8211; one that presents itself as &#8220;News&#8221; and the other that contains the opinions of the author &#8211; supported two different candidates in the same race.</p>
<p>Atlanta Progressive &#8220;News&#8221; was fond of writing hit pieces on David Scott while endorsing Donzella James for a $280 fee from the James campaign.</p>
<p>Georgia Politics Unfiltered did the reverse. Andre Walker accepted money to write glowingly of Scott.</p>
<p>The difference? The Georgia Politics Unfiltered candidate won. The Atlanta Progressive &#8220;News&#8221; candidate lost.</p>
<p>The only question is, did &#8220;Able&#8221; Mable Thomas get her money&#8217;s worth from Atlanta Progressive &#8220;News&#8221; considering the thrashing she got from John Lewis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ST</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-87463</link>
		<dc:creator>ST</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 18:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/#comment-87463</guid>
		<description>I can give you a list a mile long of local bloggers who would be better additions to Fresh Loaf than Andre. He&#039;s been a walking  firestorm/lawsuit waiting to happen for awhile now. This couldn&#039;t have happened to a more deserving guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can give you a list a mile long of local bloggers who would be better additions to Fresh Loaf than Andre. He&#8217;s been a walking  firestorm/lawsuit waiting to happen for awhile now. This couldn&#8217;t have happened to a more deserving guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CatherineAtlanta</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-87451</link>
		<dc:creator>CatherineAtlanta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 17:09:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/#comment-87451</guid>
		<description>Thank you for picking up this story from APN.  The blogosphere is a self-regulating arena so highlighting issues like this is helpful.  I&#039;m glad that APN did some investigation into the Walker/Scott connections.  Let&#039;s hope Mr Walker&#039;s readers have the opportunity to learn about these inconsistencies.

Ultimately, a blog is like the living room of a friend or neighbor.  You&#039;re invited in to hear the bloggers&#039; opinions and those of other posters.  At Blog for Democracy we encourage front page posters to disclose their affiliations/connections.  Can&#039;t say we are always successful, but we do try.  Generally, I think it&#039;s usually pretty obvious...

Have to agree with Josh - Mr Walker blogging for CL would negatively affect both the credibility and quality of CL online presence.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for picking up this story from APN.  The blogosphere is a self-regulating arena so highlighting issues like this is helpful.  I&#8217;m glad that APN did some investigation into the Walker/Scott connections.  Let&#8217;s hope Mr Walker&#8217;s readers have the opportunity to learn about these inconsistencies.</p>
<p>Ultimately, a blog is like the living room of a friend or neighbor.  You&#8217;re invited in to hear the bloggers&#8217; opinions and those of other posters.  At Blog for Democracy we encourage front page posters to disclose their affiliations/connections.  Can&#8217;t say we are always successful, but we do try.  Generally, I think it&#8217;s usually pretty obvious&#8230;</p>
<p>Have to agree with Josh &#8211; Mr Walker blogging for CL would negatively affect both the credibility and quality of CL online presence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grayson Daughters</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-87446</link>
		<dc:creator>Grayson Daughters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/#comment-87446</guid>
		<description>Political blogging is like the game of golf - self-regulated and refereed by (don&#039;t spew your coffee too hard) code of honor. 

If a blogger needs to be called-out for unwritten ethical violations, they typically ARE called-out... as in the case of APN investigating Walker&#039;s source of funding/inspiration, a rather &quot;open secret&quot; it seems. Kinda like Valerie Plame&#039;s covert status, you might say. Seems Mr. Cardinale at APN is simply playing the Robert Novak role in this matter, but I diverge... 

Wal-Mart and Edelman PR also come to mind, in the failure-to-disclose, non-political blogging category. The examples are many, and fill  vast fields of gigabytes in cyberspace.

Whether Walker will, ummm, blog in this town again, who&#039;s to say? He&#039;s tainted goods now. In the blogosphere though, tainted goods = something akin to a traffic-generating missile.

That and the fact that he works for Vernon Jones, so all bets, not to mention, ethics, are off, in that particular case.

Anyone dreaming of applying formal rules and regs and standards to the blogosphere, and I&#039;m sure they are legion, well... good luck with that little endeavor. 

Personally, I sure wouldn&#039;t mind a little pressure in all the right places to &quot;out&quot; Rogue109 over there at PP, naturally enough. Anonymous blogging is nothing if not three miles of some seriously bad road.

Get an ATV or stay on the pavement. Vroom, vroom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Political blogging is like the game of golf &#8211; self-regulated and refereed by (don&#8217;t spew your coffee too hard) code of honor. </p>
<p>If a blogger needs to be called-out for unwritten ethical violations, they typically ARE called-out&#8230; as in the case of APN investigating Walker&#8217;s source of funding/inspiration, a rather &#8220;open secret&#8221; it seems. Kinda like Valerie Plame&#8217;s covert status, you might say. Seems Mr. Cardinale at APN is simply playing the Robert Novak role in this matter, but I diverge&#8230; </p>
<p>Wal-Mart and Edelman PR also come to mind, in the failure-to-disclose, non-political blogging category. The examples are many, and fill  vast fields of gigabytes in cyberspace.</p>
<p>Whether Walker will, ummm, blog in this town again, who&#8217;s to say? He&#8217;s tainted goods now. In the blogosphere though, tainted goods = something akin to a traffic-generating missile.</p>
<p>That and the fact that he works for Vernon Jones, so all bets, not to mention, ethics, are off, in that particular case.</p>
<p>Anyone dreaming of applying formal rules and regs and standards to the blogosphere, and I&#8217;m sure they are legion, well&#8230; good luck with that little endeavor. </p>
<p>Personally, I sure wouldn&#8217;t mind a little pressure in all the right places to &#8220;out&#8221; Rogue109 over there at PP, naturally enough. Anonymous blogging is nothing if not three miles of some seriously bad road.</p>
<p>Get an ATV or stay on the pavement. Vroom, vroom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/comment-page-1/#comment-87440</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 16:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/07/30/political-blogger-andre-walkers-conflict-of-interest/#comment-87440</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m really surprised that Andre gets the readership he does since he drops the race card so much and everyone has known about his Vernon Jones conflict of interest for awhile now.

He&#039;s always on his high horse throwing out his &quot;credentials&quot; as a way to somehow justify his often rediculous statements.

I&#039;m glad he&#039;s been called out on it at length again and I&#039;d say that CL would face a massive decline in quality with the addition of Andre.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m really surprised that Andre gets the readership he does since he drops the race card so much and everyone has known about his Vernon Jones conflict of interest for awhile now.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s always on his high horse throwing out his &#8220;credentials&#8221; as a way to somehow justify his often rediculous statements.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m glad he&#8217;s been called out on it at length again and I&#8217;d say that CL would face a massive decline in quality with the addition of Andre.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
