<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (Updated) 315 W. Ponce project tabled by zoning board</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/08/12/315-w-ponce-project-tabled-by-zoning-board/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/08/12/315-w-ponce-project-tabled-by-zoning-board/</link>
	<description>Atlanta news and views, one slice at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:21:47 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 315 W. Ponce developer alters plan &#124; Fresh Loaf</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/08/12/315-w-ponce-project-tabled-by-zoning-board/comment-page-1/#comment-101216</link>
		<dc:creator>315 W. Ponce developer alters plan &#124; Fresh Loaf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2008 15:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/08/12/315-w-ponce-project-tabled-by-zoning-board/#comment-101216</guid>
		<description>[...] Metro reports that the developer of 315 W. Ponce de Leon Avenue, a mixed-use project that&#8217;s caused some nearby residents to question its size and potential impact, has altered its plans for the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Metro reports that the developer of 315 W. Ponce de Leon Avenue, a mixed-use project that&#8217;s caused some nearby residents to question its size and potential impact, has altered its plans for the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: catherine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/08/12/315-w-ponce-project-tabled-by-zoning-board/comment-page-1/#comment-89664</link>
		<dc:creator>catherine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 22:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/08/12/315-w-ponce-project-tabled-by-zoning-board/#comment-89664</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great coverage of last night&#039;s meeting. I&#039;m bummed to hear that so many residents and businesses owners are putting up such a fight. The developer and the DDDA have had a number of public sessions and worked openly with residents from the very beginning. The parking variance is just being used to try to block the development completely, which is a shame. Technically a developer could come in and build an 80 ft office building on the property without going against code. Instead, JLB Partners have worked hard to create a project that does a great job of transitioning from residential to commercial. So it&#039;s clear that a lot of the opposing residents just don&#039;t want any change. That is not the attitude that has made Decatur  a smart growth community.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great coverage of last night&#8217;s meeting. I&#8217;m bummed to hear that so many residents and businesses owners are putting up such a fight. The developer and the DDDA have had a number of public sessions and worked openly with residents from the very beginning. The parking variance is just being used to try to block the development completely, which is a shame. Technically a developer could come in and build an 80 ft office building on the property without going against code. Instead, JLB Partners have worked hard to create a project that does a great job of transitioning from residential to commercial. So it&#8217;s clear that a lot of the opposing residents just don&#8217;t want any change. That is not the attitude that has made Decatur  a smart growth community.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/08/12/315-w-ponce-project-tabled-by-zoning-board/comment-page-1/#comment-89629</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Aug 2008 16:24:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/08/12/315-w-ponce-project-tabled-by-zoning-board/#comment-89629</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not a fan of limiting density by increasing parking requirements - parking is a waste of land and free parking perverts any semblance of free market forces fairly treating pedestrian and transit users.

However I am a fan of the questions and points made by the Decatur Board of Zoning Appeals all very good points. 

If they lower density i hope they lower parking spaces by an equal amount and rely on the shared parking idea. (btw why aren&#039;t we using mega church parking lots for park and ride lots?)

Anyway Kudos to the Decatur Board of Zoning Appeals.  Great points on the missing features and affordable housing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a fan of limiting density by increasing parking requirements &#8211; parking is a waste of land and free parking perverts any semblance of free market forces fairly treating pedestrian and transit users.</p>
<p>However I am a fan of the questions and points made by the Decatur Board of Zoning Appeals all very good points. </p>
<p>If they lower density i hope they lower parking spaces by an equal amount and rely on the shared parking idea. (btw why aren&#8217;t we using mega church parking lots for park and ride lots?)</p>
<p>Anyway Kudos to the Decatur Board of Zoning Appeals.  Great points on the missing features and affordable housing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
