<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Word: Travesty of death</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/12/15/word-travesty-of-death/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/12/15/word-travesty-of-death/</link>
	<description>Atlanta news and views, one slice at a time</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 04:08:54 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Etaoin Shrdlu</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/12/15/word-travesty-of-death/comment-page-1/#comment-101532</link>
		<dc:creator>Etaoin Shrdlu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Dec 2008 01:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/?p=10917#comment-101532</guid>
		<description>The &quot;newly discovered evidence&quot; is nothing of the sort.  Davis&#039; attorneys claim that three people have come forward with exonerating statements.  Two of the three were already heard from in previous appeals, and are not credible.  I do not know who the third is, but more than likely it&#039;s another hearsay &quot;witness&quot; or otherwise non-credible person, since whoever it is must have waited a minimum of ten years after the crime to come forward (otherwise the person would have been mentioned in one of the previous nine or more appeals.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The &#8220;newly discovered evidence&#8221; is nothing of the sort.  Davis&#8217; attorneys claim that three people have come forward with exonerating statements.  Two of the three were already heard from in previous appeals, and are not credible.  I do not know who the third is, but more than likely it&#8217;s another hearsay &#8220;witness&#8221; or otherwise non-credible person, since whoever it is must have waited a minimum of ten years after the crime to come forward (otherwise the person would have been mentioned in one of the previous nine or more appeals.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean Hughes</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/2008/12/15/word-travesty-of-death/comment-page-1/#comment-101364</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 13:01:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/freshloaf/?p=10917#comment-101364</guid>
		<description>The lack of universal standards for sentencing across counties, states and the country eradicates any notion of justice.  Are we one nation or not?  Varying tax codes make sense to balance out varying resources and needs.  But, varying sentencing gives subjective decision making power over life and death.  It isn&#039;t right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lack of universal standards for sentencing across counties, states and the country eradicates any notion of justice.  Are we one nation or not?  Varying tax codes make sense to balance out varying resources and needs.  But, varying sentencing gives subjective decision making power over life and death.  It isn&#8217;t right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
