CL flickr

Visit our You Shoot page.

Heavyweight genre films rescue insubstantial dramas in 2008

December 30, 2008 at 9:00 am by Curt Holman in A&E

WING NUT: Heath Ledger (front) as the Joker and Christian Bale as Batman in 'The Dark Knight'

Genre entertainments invariably rake in more money than heavyweight film dramas — that’s what they’re made for. The striking thing about 2008 wasn’t just that the popcorn movies had more explosions and sight gags, but that they had more to say than the theoretically more substantial films. Movies about monsters, robots and caped crusaders seemed more engaged with present-day issues than the work of such celebrated filmmakers as Ron Howard, Sam Mendes, Clint Eastwood and the Coen Brothers.

Iron Man and The Dark Knight both depicted costumed zillionaires fighting injustice, but also contained pertinent metaphors for the duties of the individual in the face of urban and global problems. In the bright, frequently funny Iron Man, Robert Downey Jr. offered a playful but revelatory turn as a weapons-building industrialist reassessing his company’s — and, implicitly, his country’s — influence in the world. The Dark Knight’s knotty, expansive crime story became an increasingly fraught exploration of the risks of imposing civic order, unleashing chaos and taking responsibility for collateral damage. The film’s tragic dimensions were only heightened by the late Heath Ledger’s compelling portrayal of the Joker as an anarchic psycho.

Audiences have come to expect annual masterpieces from the computer-animation geniuses at Pixar. WALL-E offered no exception in its unlikely love story about a cute robot, but director/co-writer Andrew Stanton delivered some of the most sharply satirical themes of any Pixar film. His story pointed out that rampant consumerism could have apocalyptic consequences for the planet and infantilizing effects on the human race.

The stark storytelling of Sweden’s Let the Right One In would’ve offered one of the year’s most powerful treatments of alienation and friendship even without the revelation that one of the adolescent protagonists was a vampire. A different kind of monster movie, Cloverfield, offered the year’s biggest adrenaline rush. Even if it wasn’t particularly deep, it preyed on post-9/11 anxieties similar to how 1950s sci-fi touched on Cold War paranoia.

The obscure French gem OSS 117: Cairo, Nest of Spies seemed to be a pleasant trifle — a spoof of 1960s spy films far more shagadelic than any Austin Powers comedy. In portraying Western ignorance and arrogance in the Muslim world, however, OSS 117 offered some sharp commentary on pre-Sept. 11 attitudes. James Marsh’s exciting documentary Man on Wire revealed suspense worthy of a heist film. It showed how French acrobat Philippe Petit planned and executed his 1974 high-wire walk across the World Trade Center buildings, and serves as a tribute to the Twin Towers without ever mentioning the attacks.

Even the two liveliest of the year’s “prestige films,” Danny Boyle’s Slumdog Millionaire and Darren Aronofsky’s The Wrestler, rely on some extremely old fashioned melodramatic tropes. Slumdog Millionaire transplants a manipulative, Dickensian rags-to-riches tale to modern day Mumbai, while The Wrestler relies on (but also inverts) B-movie boxing movie clichés that predate Rocky.

Meanwhile, well-crafted would-be Oscar contenders such as Frost/Nixon, Gran Torino and Revolutionary Road offered surprisingly simplistic messages about the personal flaws of Richard Nixon, the self-defeating nature of bigotry and the emptiness of the suburbs, respectively.

Gun Van Sant’s Milk rises above some tired biopic conventions thanks primarily to the strength of Sean Penn’s performance as gay rights activist Harvey Milk and, unfortunately, its timeliness following the victory of California’s Proposition 8. Last year’s Oscar winners the Coen Brothers juxtaposed espionage with information-age romance in Burn After Reading for funny but minor-key results.

Fortunately, Charlie Kaufman’s darkly comic head trip Synecdoche, New York offered more ideas and intellectual rigor than any 10 other films. Two other highbrow highlights included Kate Winslet’s The Reader and the masterful Czech film I Served the King of England — one a weighty drama, the other a cautionary comedy — in which protagonists face the consequences of getting into bed, literally and figuratively, with a Nazi.

Perhaps the 2007-2008 Hollywood writer’s strike had a ripple effect that postponed some of the richer, more challenging projects to next year. One can only hope so: The superheroes may not save the day in 2009.

(Photo by Stephen Vaughan)

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

3 Responses to “Heavyweight genre films rescue insubstantial dramas in 2008”

  1. skywalker007 Says:

    WALL-E is not getting all the hype it deserves

    I hope WALL-E ends up on the Best Picture Nod. If it doesn’t, I will not watch the oscars. Unlike Ratatouille and the Incredibles, WALL-E had a wonderful allegorial story. If those movies did have allegory, then, because I didn’t find it, then the allegories are not as conspicious as in WALL-E.

    If you complained that WALL-E was preachy, that shows how ignorant you are. Good movies are also here to give lessons out, not just to entertain. We can’t expect entertainment all the time. WALL-E shows reality. To not accept the movie’s message, is not accepting reality. To not accept reality means that you cannot survive in this world.

    WALL-E costed 180,000,000 to make, just as much as the Dark Knight. So many people worked so hard on it. Ben Burtt did amazing voice design, Stanton wrote his most daring script, the computer graphics were realistic (with the exception of the human characters), Newman did a beautiful themed score (WHY DID HE NOT GET A NOD FOR BEST MUSIC AT THE ANNIES?!), etc.,etc.

    WALL-E is not one of the bloated romance films like the great, but overrated Titanic. Titanic did nothing but circled around Jack and Rose romance. There were many things going on beside WALL-E’s and EVE’s romance- There was a lethargic society, a polluted Earth, and machines discovering life. And WALL-E romance with EVE affected humanity. It not one of those romances that circles entirely around the couple, it a romance where they circled around the world.

    WALL-E is certainly better than Kung Fu Panda. Kung Fu Panda only took 130 million to make. Kung Fu Panda is certainly funnier, but comedy is not enough to define a good movie. Kung Fu Panda had a excellent storyline, but it is what it is, it was only meant to make children laugh and enjoy it. Kung Fu Panda is not of the universal. Young children will love the cuteness of WALL-E, and teens and adults will love the allegorical story.

    Dreamworks may be funnier, but Pixar succeeds in mixed comedy with out-of-this world storylines. Storylines matter more than comedy.

    If you think comedy defines how good a movie is, you are one of those inconsiderate people who give no damn toward the hard effort.

    What use is an Annie Award to WALL-E? WALL-E is no animated movie, it’s a romance made by animation. Saying that WALL-E is an animated movie is discriminating.

    If WALL-E doesn’t show up on the Best Picture category, I will never watch the Oscars again. Mark my words.

    I will also boycott the Oscars if the Dark Knight doesn’t show up in the Best Picture nomination. Like WALL-E it has an allegorial story.

    So please, consider my words.

  2. Buffalo Says:

    Good notes but “Let the Right One In” is a Swedish flick, not Danish.

  3. MoroccoMole Says:

    “The Reader”? Really?

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image