Streetalk: Do you prefer a significant other with tattoos?
May 24, 2009 at 9:56 am by Jeff Slate in Streetalk
Penny: My significant other doesn’t have any tattoos, which I love. But if she did, I’d want her to have an invisible one that you could only see in the black light that hangs over my bed. It would be a little secret between us. I’d get to see them, but nobody else would. It’s sexy she has no ink. I like her plainness. It’s delicious. She loves my ink. She plays with them. I love my tattoos, but I’m not a girl. It’s hypocritical, but that doesn’t change a thing. I’ve seen a lot of girls with a lot of ink and really bad tattoos.
Rhonda: Yes. That shows they’re going to have something in common with me, just like Buckhead people having blond hair. But I’d prefer someone with unique tattoos. A lot of guys have tribal tattoos, and it’s like, “Wow, that’s not original.” Then they try to create a deep meaning behind it instead of admitting they got a really stupid tattoo. With Japanese symbols down your back you look like an idiot. It’s been done 5,000 times — not to mention you’re not fuckin’ Japanese.
Brit: Yes, I do. I know that she has money to waste. I also find a girl with tattoos creative. I don’t like it when the tattoo says, “Property of Scooter.” I don’t know who Scooter is. If you have one, it might be scary. You might be looking over your shoulder going, “Scooter is about to walk through the door.” I don’t like a tattoo that says, “Snookie’s girl.” It’s a jail-style tattoo. It shows that person made a bad long-term decision. And Snookie may come through the door and say, “It’s obvious she’s my property.”
May 26th, 2009 at 12:07 pm
lol @ brit.
November 24th, 2009 at 7:47 am
Hey Rhona,
great tattoo!
Yeah, an original tattoo is much more desirable than one chosen by scmucks who lack imagination and choose unoriginal work!
Tribal Tattoos…please