A house divided — on Genarlow Wilson
Friday, October 26th, 2007Within heartbeats of the Georgia Supreme Court’s 4-3 decision releasing Genarlow Wilson, the statements from officials began hitting the in-boxes.
Thurbert Baker, the state’s lackluster attorney general, quickly whipped out this CYA missive: “I have received and reviewed the decision by the Georgia Supreme Court in this matter, and I respectfully acknowledge the Court’s authority to grant the relief that they have crafted in this case. As the Supreme Court found, the habeas court’s order resentencing Mr. Wilson, however well-meaning, was unauthorized under Georgia law. It was for this reason that I appealed, in order to insure a fair and consistent application of the law not just to Mr. Wilson, but to others similarly situated. I hope the Court’s decision will also put an end to this issue as a matter of contention in the hearts and minds of concerned Georgians and others across the country who have taken such a strong interest in this case.”
Interpreted, that’s a big “Oh, shit!” The first bit of obfuscation basically says the Supreme Court has the authority to be the Supreme Court.
After a judge had ruled that Wilson’s 10-year sentence — recall that while undoubtedly behaving badly, this was a case of teen consensual sex — was cruel and unusual punishment. That ruling was self-evident, but Baker, a black Democrat who does little to protect Georgians but will do anything to appease the neo-Confederate Republicans, quickly appealed the ruling. Wilson spent more time in jail.
The next news release came from Senate President Pro Tempore Eric Johnson, one of those aforementioned Republican neo-Confederates who long for the days of white sheets and all-white juries.





