CL flickr

Visit our You Shoot page.

Georgia Court of Appeals reverses coal plant CO2 ruling

Tuesday, July 7th, 2009

The Georgia Court of Appeals today reversed a landmark 2008 Fulton County Superior Court ruling regarding a proposed “clean coal” plant in southwest Georgia.

That ruling invalidated an air quality permit issued to Plant Longleaf in Early County because the state failed to place a limit on the facility’s carbon emissions.

UPDATE after the jump.

(more…)

Dynegy pulls out of Early County coal plant project

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

Dynegy, a Texas-based energy company that proposed what would’ve been Georgia’s first new coal power plant in 20 years, announced today that it has pulled out of the project.

From a company press release:

Dynegy Inc. (NYSE:DYN) today announced that it has entered into an agreement with LS Power Associates, L.P. to dissolve the two companies’ development joint venture. Under the terms of the dissolution, Dynegy will acquire exclusive rights, ownership and developmental control of all repowering or expansion opportunities related to its existing portfolio of operating assets. LS Power will acquire full ownership and developmental rights associated with various “greenfield” projects under consideration in Arkansas, Georgia, Iowa, Michigan and Nevada, as well as other power generation and transmission development projects not related to Dynegy’s existing operating portfolio of assets.

The reason?

“The development landscape has changed significantly since we agreed to enter into the development joint venture with LS Power in the fall of 2006,” said Bruce A. Williamson, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Dynegy Inc. “Today, the development of new generation is increasingly marked by barriers to entry including external credit and regulatory factors that make development much more uncertain. In light of these market circumstances, Dynegy has elected to focus development activities and investments around our own portfolio where we control the option to develop and can manage the costs being incurred more closely.”

Or, in English: These plants are damn hard to finance and risky at a time when federal carbon legislation seems increasingly likely.

The proposed Early County plant — called Plant Longleaf — generated national headlines this summer when a Fulton County Superior Court judge ruled that the state Environmental Protection Division needed to take carbon emissions into account during the permitting process. That ruling — the first of its kind in the United States — was appealed by Dynegy. A company spokesman told CL that LS Power, the energy company’s partner in the Early County project, is now in control of Plant Longleaf’s development. An LS Power spokesperson was not available for comment. We’ll update when we hear word.

Coal plant case could have nationwide impact

Monday, June 30th, 2008

A little more than one year after filing suit against a coal plant proposed for an impoverished pocket of southwest Georgia, opponents emerged victorious in the case and say the decision alters the legal landscape for one of the chief causes of global warming.

Justine Thompson of GreenLaw, the environmental law firm that fought the power plant, says Fulton County Superior Court Judge Thelma Wyatt Cummings Moore established a precedent this morning when she reversed a ruling by a lower court regarding a permit issued by the state Environmental Protection Division to Dynegy Co., the Houston-based company that planned to build the plant in Early County. Moore’s ruling — the first in the nation — states that the state agency must consider carbon dioxide emissions when it issues air-quality permits.

“A bombshell court ruling today,” Frank O’Donnell of the Clean Air Watch, a Washington D.C.-based environmental group, wrote in an e-mail about Moore’s decision. “This ruling could have far-reaching implications. Those proposing coal plants elsewhere are going to be running for the Excedrin.”

Bruce Nilles of the Sierra Club says the ruling is nonbinding for other states but would most likely be considered when cases involving new or modified coal power plants come before a court. Nationwide, he said, 130 new coal plants are proposed. Of those, nearly 80 are in the permitting process and more than half are being battled in court by the Sierra Club.

“In a case that is being watched across the country, Judge Moore has sent a message that it is not acceptable for the state to put profits over public health,” Thompson said in a statement. “This ruling goes a long way toward protecting the right of Georgians to breathe clean air and sends a message to EPD that it must tighten the standards it uses to approve air pollution permits for companies seeking to build any more coal-fired power plants in this state.” (more…)

Coal-fired power plant ruling expected next week

Friday, June 27th, 2008

Georgians may find out next week if they get their first new coal power plant in 20 years.

Lawyers with GreenLaw, an environmental law firm that argued against the Longleaf Plant in Early County, said Fulton County Superior Court Thelma Wyatt Cummings Moore will issue a ruling between Monday and Thursday. The case examines whether the state Environmental Protection Division acted appropriately in not requiring the proposed coal plant to regulate its carbon dioxide emissions, the greenhouse gas scientists say is concentrating in the atmosphere and causing global warming.

Dynegy Co. and LS Power, the two companies pushing the plant, say it would add to the impoverished county’s tax base and bring much-needed jobs to the area. A host of opponents and critics said most of the created jobs would be temporary construction positions and that any benefit to the county would be outweighed by the health impact of the plant’s harmful emissions. The Medical Association of Georgia issued a resolution opposing any new coal plants in the state because of their emissions’ unhealthy effects.

It’s a tough call, however. Even Moore expressed difficulty with the position in which she was placed, as she stated from the bench during the case’s June 3 hearing:

“No one can be employed if they’re falling down dying,” she said, adding that she had 19 boxes of documents sitting in the clerk’s office that she needed to examine. “We need to look at both the economy and the environment. That’s what I will do.”

Moore’s ruling could establish a precedent as well, something that Dynegy’s lawyers argued would be inappropriate were it decided by a judge rather than politicians. Should Moore rule against the plant, her court would be the first in the country to do so.

Georgia coal plant’s future hinges on ruling

Tuesday, June 3rd, 2008

It’s hard to miss the opponents of coal-fired power plants — they’re decked out in bright colors, holding signs warning of the hazards of the carbon-belching behemoths, and are large in number when the chance arises to trumpet their cause. Those who support the nation’s cheapest and most predominant power providers wear suits, travel in stealth mode, and have high-dollar lawyers do all the talking for them.

That was the case this morning in Fulton County Superior Court when Judge Thelma Wyatt Cummings Moore presided over a packed courtroom to hear arguments over Georgia’s first coal-fired power plant in 20 years.

Houston-based Dynegy and LS Power plan to build the plant in southwest Georgia near Albany. Lawyers from the environmental law firm GreenLaw representing the Sierra Club and Friends of the Chattahoochee argued that the 1,200-megawatt plant would not regulate the estimated 9 million tons of carbon dioxide — a greenhouse gas and chief culprit of global warming — and be in violation of state and federal law. Also of concern was the permitting process conducted by the state Environmental Protection Division.

The proposed plant has been called both a Godsend and a curse for impoverished Early County, one of the poorest in Georgia. Proponents for the $2-billion plant argue that it will create 750 construction jobs and 100 permanent positions and in years would become the county’s largest taxpayer. Critics point to the fact that its presence would result in a health hazard for its citizens and the rest of the state, ultimately stunting the county from making any real gains in the future. That’s not to mention the concerns about global warming.

Lawyers from Longleaf argued that while the issue of global warming and the impact of coal-fired power plants needs to be addressed, the discussion should not take place in the courtroom. They argued that critics were using the court to push that discussion and that it’s a policy decision best left to policymakers such as the Georgia General Assembly and the U.S. Congress.

The state is still in denial as to whether global warming even exists. The U.S. Senate, however, is beginning such a discussion this week, one which President Bush is expected to veto if it proves successful in bringing about change to the country’s current stance on global warming.

Moore is expected to deliver a ruling in 30 days.

“No one can be employed if they’re falling down dying,” she said, adding that she had 19 boxes of documents sitting in the clerk’s office that she needed to examine. “We need to look at both the economy and the environment. That’s what I will do.”

Coal plant, environmentalists get day in court tomorrow

Monday, June 2nd, 2008

Like breathing clean air? Don’t want to inhale toxins? You might want to keep your eyes peeled on Fulton County Superior Court tomorrow.

Judge Thelma Wyatt Cummings Moore will hear arguments over whether coal power plants should regulate carbon dioxide as a pollutant and harmful to humans. The argument stems from the state Environmental Protection Division’s decision to issue an air pollution permit to Dynegy, the nation’s largest plant builder, for its proposed plant in impoverished Early County. The 1,200-megawatt plant slated to be built on the banks of the Chattahoochee in southwest Georgia is estimated to emit 9 million tons of CO2 every year — the equivalent of 1.5 million cars driving 12,000 miles each year.

A group of environmental groups including the Sierra Club and the Friends of the Chattahoochee are fighting the plant. GreenLaw, an Atlanta-based environmental law firm, is arguing the case. The judge’s ruling — which is expected within 30 days of the hearing — could halt or suspend the plant’s construction.

The hearing begins at 9:30 a.m. at at the Fulton County Superior Court located at 185 Central Avenue, Atlanta, GA.

For more information about the case, click here.

Judge grants permit to first coal-powered plant in 20 years, opponents plan to appeal

Friday, January 11th, 2008

A federal judge in Atlanta this morning approved a permit for Plant Longleaf, a coal-fired power plant in Early County, in the process giving the green light to a facility that is expected to pump out 9 million tons of carbon dioxide each year — the equivalent of 1.3 million cars. GreenLaw, the environmental law firm that brought the case to court on behalf of the Sierra Club and Friends of Chattahoochee, says it will file an appeal before Feb. 1.

GreenLaw criticized the state Environmental Protection Division for not conducting an independent analysis on the potential impacts of Plant Longleaf, including the impact of plant emissions on local crops.

“This is the first coal-fired power plant in over 20 years, and we had hoped the state would do its own independent analysis,” says Justine Thompson of GreenLaw.

Bobby McLendon of Friends of the Chattahoochee and a resident of Early County, says he’s concerned about the plant’s potential health impacts, such as particulate matter. And while he says the medical community in Early County is worried about those effects, the local business community welcomes Longleaf.

“A lot of people down here in the banking business and chamber of commerce-type business, I think they want the thing,” McLendon says. “They think it’ll help.”

Early County is one of Georgia’s poorest counties and Plant Longleaf is expected to bring 100 jobs. McLendon says he doesn’t like to “talk about his neighbors,” but has tried to emphasize the long-term effects the plant may have not just on health, but on the environment as well. Thompson stresses that the plant would also impact the surrounding counties, and even more broadly, contribute to Georgia’s already large share of global-warming pollutants.

“The EPD has forgotten their middle name is ‘protection,’” says Patty Durand of Sierra Club’s Georgia chapter. “It’s time for the state of Georgia to say ‘enough’ to dirty coal. The EPD failed the citizens of Georgia by not conducting a thorough analysis of this plant.”

To view GreenLaw’s statement, click here. Included is the judge’s ruling and facts about Plant Longleaf.