Fresh Loaf

Neil Peirce of the Washington Post Writers Group weighs in:

My short analysis: With Obama, we’re likely to get an activist federal government in areas from transit and infrastructure to housing. But it won’t be the Democrats’ historic center-city “urban policy.” Instead, Obama’s looking for ways to shift and coordinate federal programs to help boost the fortunes of entire metro regions.

McCain? One has to be a super-detective to discern any city-metro policy at all. We know what he’s against, starting with pork-barrel spending, particularly earmarks for politicians’ pet local projects. We know he’s for less government regulation and lower taxes for individuals, small businesses, corporations.

But do we have even a hint of a federal partnership with urban/metro America under a McCain administration? So far no. The silence could be intentional. The Sarah Palin vice presidential selection, the Republican National Convention’s celebration of small towns and invective against “cosmopolitanism” and community organizing, smacks of a calculated anti-urban message.

Read the rest here.

Bookmark It

It’s refreshing to see a candidate not focus entirely on eating BBQ in Kansas and churning butter out in the sticks. Those voters and their concerns matter, but so do those who live in the nation’s economic engines: Urban areas, such as Atlanta.

And the Wall Street Journal reports Democratic presidential nominee Barack Obama is set to relaunch his urban platform today that he says would aid our beleaguered cities.

The article is so chockful of information that it deserves to be read more than reviewed, but here are some snippets:

The wide-ranging plan contains bedrock Democratic principles, pledging to increase funding for affordable housing, raise the minimum wage to $9.50 by 2011, triple the income-tax credit tied to that wage and fully fund the federal No Child Left Behind policy for schools.

Centerpieces include creation of a new White House Office of Urban Policy and the restoration of billions of dollars cut from community block grants, a key source of funding for cities.

In a nod to one of the mayors’ top priorities, Sen. Obama would open a national bank, seeded with $60 billion over 10 years, to finance road, bridge, airport and other public-works projects in metropolitan areas. The bank would be modeled on the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., with an independent board of directors.

Sen. Obama says his administration would shift urban-policy making to so-called smart-growth strategies that synchronize transportation, commercial and housing needs for entire regions, rather than following the tradition of focusing first on fighting poverty and crime. He would fund $200 million in annual grants to develop “regional clusters,” such as the high-technology-focused area known as the Research Triangle in North Carolina.

(Thanks to Christa for the find)

Bookmark It

Attention all wonks! Atlanta is once again featured in a story about the changing faces of cities. The Wall Street Journal reports cities nationwide are seeing whites moving back into cities in large numbers as African-Americans move out. Big shock, I know, but they’ve got great numbers to prove it.

From the article:

Today, cities are refashioning themselves as trendy centers devoid of suburban ills like strip malls and long commutes. In Atlanta, which has among the longest commute times of any U.S. city, the white population rose by 26,000 between 2000 and 2006, while the black population decreased by 8,900. Overall the white proportion has increased to 35% in 2006 from 31% in 2000.

The WSJ focuses heavily on Washington, D.C. and San Francisco, but we get a little play in there, even a mention of how the next mayor’s race may feature the first competitive white candidate since the 1980s.

For an Atlanta-focused — and well-written — take on the the city’s gentrification, check out this article by Governing Magazine’s Rob Gurwitt.

(Many thanks to the mysterious “Christa” at PecanneLog for the find.)

Bookmark It

CL Columnist John Sugg raised the question with some local thinkers and officials last year. In Long Island, neighbor of New York City and childhood home of a dysfunctional starlet, a group of academics are conducting a six-month study to see if it should become the 51st state.

Looking to whack Albany with a political two-by-four, Suffolk Comptroller Joseph Sawicki and Dowling College agreed to launch a new feasibility study on the economics of Long Island seceding to become the 51st state.

…

Both Sawicki and Cantor acknowledged such a split may be tough to sell politically to the rest of the state, but it is important to raise the issue to underline how much the region contributes to state operations and how much less it gets back — a gap of $2.9 billion.

“It’s time for us to begin to think outside the box. In our case, it’s that sandbox in Albany that we must look beyond,” said Sawicki, adding later, “If we were getting our fair share of education aid from the state, we wouldn’t be here talking about this.”

Bookmark It

Why? From an article by two thinkers at the Brookings Institution about Chicago’s woes:

Collectively, the top 100 metros take up only 12 percent of the land in the United States, but account for an astounding 65 percent of our population, 68 percent of jobs and 75 percent of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product. If talented people, quality jobs, innovative firms, advanced universities, planes, trains and, of course, money make the world go round — well, then metro regions are the axis.

Use that vote.

Bookmark It