<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: “Top Chef” races to the finish line on Wednesday</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/omnivore/2008/06/09/%e2%80%9ctop-chef%e2%80%9d-races-to-the-finish-line-on-wednesday/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/omnivore/2008/06/09/%e2%80%9ctop-chef%e2%80%9d-races-to-the-finish-line-on-wednesday/</link>
	<description>A blog dedicated to the discussion of food, restaurants and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 17:02:16 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Besha Rodell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/omnivore/2008/06/09/%e2%80%9ctop-chef%e2%80%9d-races-to-the-finish-line-on-wednesday/comment-page-1/#comment-1273</link>
		<dc:creator>Besha Rodell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 18:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/omnivore/2008/06/09/%e2%80%9ctop-chef%e2%80%9d-races-to-the-finish-line-on-wednesday/#comment-1273</guid>
		<description>Actually, it&#039;s not the judges&#039; palates that I quibble with - I&#039;m sure they do kick people off for the worst dish of the challenge - (and yes, it is funny that Colicchio uses the show&#039;s fatal flaw as a defense - you almost want to say - fine - you&#039;re right - cooking really isn&#039;t suited to television, let&#039;s all tune out). What I quibble with is that very premise - if there&#039;s two chefs with sub par dishes, but one of them has been a much stronger contestant throughout, it&#039;s bad for the competition to refuse to take that into consideration. If you don&#039;t, you end up with a chef like Lisa in the finale, when there are many better chefs who should have been there instead. I understand the idea that at this level one mistake can send a chef home, but I don&#039;t think that should outweigh consistently sucking. At this level, consistently sucking should send you home.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, it&#8217;s not the judges&#8217; palates that I quibble with &#8211; I&#8217;m sure they do kick people off for the worst dish of the challenge &#8211; (and yes, it is funny that Colicchio uses the show&#8217;s fatal flaw as a defense &#8211; you almost want to say &#8211; fine &#8211; you&#8217;re right &#8211; cooking really isn&#8217;t suited to television, let&#8217;s all tune out). What I quibble with is that very premise &#8211; if there&#8217;s two chefs with sub par dishes, but one of them has been a much stronger contestant throughout, it&#8217;s bad for the competition to refuse to take that into consideration. If you don&#8217;t, you end up with a chef like Lisa in the finale, when there are many better chefs who should have been there instead. I understand the idea that at this level one mistake can send a chef home, but I don&#8217;t think that should outweigh consistently sucking. At this level, consistently sucking should send you home.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
