DIG THIS!


NYT’s Brooks: ‘The Two Obamas’

June 21, 2008 at 4:38 pm by Wayne Garcia

In the interest of equal-time bashing here at Pohoworld, this morning’s op-ed piece by the New York Times‘ David Brooks is a hardcore (and deserved) stripping away of Barack Obama’s sainthood. Here’s an excerpt:

Dr. Barack could have changed the way presidential campaigning works. John McCain offered to have a series of extended town-hall meetings around the country. But favored candidates don’t go in for unscripted free-range conversations. Fast Eddie Obama threw the new-politics mantra under the truck.

And then on Thursday, Fast Eddie Obama had his finest hour. Barack Obama has worked on political reform more than any other issue. He aspires to be to political reform what Bono is to fighting disease in Africa. He’s spent much of his career talking about how much he believes in public financing. In January 2007, he told Larry King that the public-financing system works. In February 2007, he challenged Republicans to limit their spending and vowed to do so along with them if he were the nominee. In February 2008, he said he would aggressively pursue spending limits. He answered a Midwest Democracy Network questionnaire by reminding everyone that he has been a longtime advocate of the public-financing system.

But Thursday, at the first breath of political inconvenience, Fast Eddie Obama threw public financing under the truck. In so doing, he probably dealt a death-blow to the cause of campaign-finance reform. And the only thing that changed between Thursday and when he lauded the system is that Obama’s got more money now.


Send to a Friend:





Send to a friend:

2 Responses to “NYT’s Brooks: ‘The Two Obamas’”

  1. roger Says:

    “Fast Eddie Obama”

    FAIL.

  2. Truth2Truth Says:

    Not to mention that paper-thin resume.

    How long was he a U.S. senator before he started running for prez?

    What did he do before that, lead some community groups?

    What was he in charge of - anything?

    Dems really couldn’t come up with someone a bit more qualified?

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image