You can keep the Iraq War spending or trade for what’s behind Door No. 2
Wednesday, May 7th, 2008Let’s leave aside for a second whether the Iraq War to this point has been folly or necessity and take as given that any dollars we spend going forward are pretty much wasted. If that is true, the National Priorities Project has a very nifty trade-off calculator that tells us all the goodies we could have in Tampa Bay if we didn’t fund the war over the next two budget years:
Taxpayers in Tampa Bay Metro Area, Florida will pay $1.1 billion for the President’s request for additional Iraq war spending in FY2008 and FY2009. For the same amount of money, the following could have been provided:
378,693 People with Health Care for One Year OR
754,817 Homes with Renewable Electricity for One Year OR
24,723 Public Safety Officers for One year OR
17,145 Music and Arts Teachers for One Year OR
334,774 Scholarships for University Students for One Year OR
74 New Elementary Schools OR
7,915 Affordable Housing Units OR
593,198 Children with Health Care for One Year OR
146,444 Head Start Places for Children for One Year OR
18,300 Elementary School Teachers for One Year OR
13,043 Port Container Inspectors for One year
The calculator lets you run similar trade-off calculations for repealing Bush’s tax cuts and other administration priorities.

378,693 People with Health Care for One Year OR






Jamie Leigh Jones, now 22, says that after she was raped by multiple men at a KBR camp in the Green Zone, the company put her under guard in a shipping container with a bed and warned her that if she left Iraq for medical treatment, she’d be out of a job.