He’s still in love with Sarah Palin

By Dan Sullivan
PoHo Contributor

I confess: I’ve been having an affair with Sarah Palin. That’s why she’s stepping down as governor of Alaska.

Don’t get me wrong, this is not the kind of affair that ends a political career. Unlike certain other political affairs of late (Read: Mark Sanford, John Ensign) this affair is not one of the scandalous variety. Quite the contrary. My affair with Alaska’s sweetheart could be just the thing that propels her into the White House in 2012.

See, it isn’t just me who’s having an affair with Sexy Sarah. She’s the darling of many conservative Americans. She stole our hearts from the moment she first stepped onto the national stage back in August as John McCain’s running mate. And now, she’s dissolving her marriage to Alaska to become better acquainted with us — her secret lover — the rest of America.

For me, the affair has lasted long after I met her backstage at a campaign rally shortly before the ‘08 election (see photo above). Of course, I’m not naïve enough to fail to recognize that much of Sarah Palin’s popularity has to do with the fact that she’s an 11 on the hotness scale. If she were an old, fat, white guy, I doubt anyone would care. Read the rest of this entry »

Handicapping the 2012 presidential race … already

The poli sci minds at UVA have a good roundup of the presidential hopefuls four years out, and even before Obama is sworn in. Here’s the intro to the red list:

Here’s the worst kept secret in politics: Presidential campaigning never ends. For periods of time it becomes quieter–a little subtler–but it never stops. Every morning 100 senators, 50 governors, quite a few grandees in the House of Representatives, and an assortment of corporate titans all hear their Rice Krispies shouting “2012!” “FORM A PRESIDENTIAL EXPLORATORY COMMITTEE!” and “RUN … YOU’RE THE ONE!”

Democrats will shush Snap, Crackle, and Pop, pleading with them to instead say, “2016!” Republicans on the other hand, will pour another bowl, and ask the three sirens of Battle Creek, Michigan, to repeat what they just said.

Of course, Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee are already doing battle for the hearts and minds of the social conservatives for 2012. (Kee-rist, you can’t even turn on the TV without seeing Mitt comment on the auto bailout or anything he is asked.) And Sarah Palin, La. Gov. Bobby Jindal, and Tim Pawlenty from the 2008 Veep race are mentioned, of course. Newcomers to the GOP list include Miss. Gov. Haley Barbour and SC Gov. Mark Sanford. Bubbling under is Cong. Eric Cantor, a darling of the right. Others: Former Md. Lt. Gov. Michael Steele (also seeking the RNC chair), New Jersey’s Chris Christie, and Va.’s Bob McDonnell.

Not a very inspiring list, huh Republicans? Where’s the great white hope that will lead the GOP out of the woods and back into the hearts of centrist voters?

Mike Huckabee headed to Tampa with his pissy, anti-Mitt memoir

Former Ark. Gov. MIke Huckabee has a new book out in which he berates his fellow Republicans for not embracing his presidential campaign the way they should have. He calls out Mitt Romney, according to an NYT account of Time’s preview:

Mr. Huckabee, who came from way back in the Republican pack to defeat Mr. Romney in the Iowa, excoriates his former foe in the book as “anything but conservative until he changed the light bulbs in his chandelier in time to run for president,” according to a report in Time magazine.

Oh, snap!

The Huckster is bringing his road show of part-memoir, part-2012 campaign launch to Tampa in a book signing being sponsored by the independent Inkwood Books:

On Friday, November 28, Inkwood Books presents MIKE HUCKABEE as he signs his book, DO THE RIGHT THING: INSIDE THE MOVEMENT THAT’S BRINGING COMMON SENSE BACK TO AMERICA. The event is for one hour only, from 9 until 10 a.m. in Hyde Park Village – our thanks to the management.  Do the Right Thing is part campaign memoir, part manifesto, with the inside story of Huckabee’s longshot grassroots Presidential campaign, plus his optimistic vision for America’s future. The signing is limited to books purchased from Inkwood, with no personalization. Books will be available for purchase at the event, but we encourage advance purchase for your convenience. For additional details contact the bookstore at 813-253-2638 or inkwoodbks@aol.com.

The Short List — Wed., July 16

Impressive video of the Ron Paul Revolution March in Washington D.C. on July 12. I’m wondering about that chant, though. “Ron Paul! Freedom! Ron Paul! Freedom!” Is this supposed to mean something?

  • Choice quotes from the presidential candidates yesterday (I’ll let you figure out who’s who):

“This war diminishes our security, our standing in the world, our military, our economy, and the resources that we need to confront the challenges of the 21st century. By any measure, our single-minded and open-ended focus on Iraq is not a sound strategy for keeping America safe.”

“With the right strategy and the right forces, we can succeed in both Iraq and Afghanistan. I know how to win wars. And if I’m elected President, I will turn around the war in Afghanistan, just as we have turned around the war in Iraq, with a comprehensive strategy for victory.”

Romney out; Europe, gays, poor people and heathens to blame

Mitt Romney dropped out of the GOP presidential race today, after his crushing defeats on Super Fat Tuesday and not a moment too soon for those who were tired of seeing one of the most shameless, calculating and plastic presidential candidates in modern times. Romney went even further in his speech today than he did Tuesday in blaming lots of things for the decline of American life as we know it:

“The threat to our culture comes from within.  The 1960’s welfare programs created a culture of poverty.  Some think we won that battle when we reformed welfare, but the liberals haven’t given up.  At every turn, they try to substitute government largesse for individual responsibility.  They fight to strip work requirements from welfare, to put more people on Medicaid, and to remove more and more people from having to pay any income tax whatsoever.  Dependency is death to initiative, risk-taking and opportunity. Dependency is a culture-killing drug.  We have got to fight it like the poison it is.

“The attack on faith and religion is no less relentless.  And tolerance for pornography – even celebration of it – and sexual promiscuity, combined with the twisted incentives of government welfare programs have led to today’s grim realities: 68% of African American children are born out-of-wedlock, 45% of Hispanic children, and 25% of White children.  How much harder it is for these children to succeed in school and in life.  A nation built on the principles of the Founding Fathers cannot long stand when its children are raised without fathers in the home.

“The development of a child is enhanced by having a mother and father.  Such a family is the ideal for the future of the child and for the strength of a nation.  I wonder how it is that unelected judges, like some in my state of Massachusetts, are so unaware of this reality, so oblivious to the millennia of recorded history.  It is time for the people of America to fortify marriage through Constitutional amendment, so that liberal judges cannot continue to attack it.

“Europe is facing a demographic disaster.  That is the inevitable product of weakened faith in the Creator, failed families, disrespect for the sanctity of human life and eroded morality.  Some reason that culture is merely an accessory to America’s vitality; we know that it is the source of our strength.  And we are not dissuaded by the snickers and knowing glances when we stand up for family values, and morality, and culture.  We will always be honored to stand on principle and to stand for principle.

Who won Super Tuesday?

That is a tough question to answer. The easier question is, who lost Super Tuesday, and the answer to that is Mitt Romney.

Romney saw much of his vote get siphoned off by a resurgent Mike Huckabee, especially in the South where the Huckster pretty much got a slam-dunk. The surprisingly strong showing by Huckabee puts him into the No. 2 seat and begs the question: Why is Mitt still in the race today? The wah-wahhh’ing and state of denial from Mittland began long before yesterday. Like this from the candidate himself on Super Fat Tuesday morning:

The signs are good that conservatives are listening and saying, ‘You know what, we don’t want to take the liberal path. [Unfortunately for Romney, he was right about conservatives but wrong about who they would gravitate to instead.]

And this from his campaign manager Beth Myers on the West Virginia results:

“Unfortunately, this is what Senator McCain’s inside Washington ways look like: he cut a backroom deal with the tax-and-spend candidate he thought could best stop Governor Romney’s campaign of conservative change.

“Governor Romney had enough respect for the Republican voters of West Virginia to make an appeal to them about the future of the party based on issues. This is why he led on today’s first ballot. Sadly, Senator McCain cut a Washington backroom deal in a way that once again underscores his legacy of working against Republicans who are interested in championing conservative policies and rebuilding the party.”

And then there’s Romney’s wonderfully scary speech last night in which he practically threatens America and tells us how we’re heading down the shitter without him at the helm (with some poorly choreographed call-and-response from the MittSturmTroopers):

By Wednesday AM, leaked copies of McCain campaign strategery were touting the near-mathematical impossibility of Romney winning the nomination, something that would require Romney winning 50 percent of the remaining primary votes.

(For an even bigger belly laugh, wander over to Wade Tatangelo’s Tampa Calling blog for a Top 10 list of songs for Romney, including Ray Charles’ “Hit The Road Jack”)

On the Democratic side, things are murkier than ever and leaves Florida and Michigan still at the center of the battle. Our delegates are not going to be seated, as things stand now, and would go to Hillary if they were seated. If nobody wins outright before the convention, there will be some wild maneuvering and wheeling and dealing to try to get them seated (on Hillary’s part) or blocking them and disenfranchising the votes in those naughty, naughty states (on Obama’s part).

Although HRC won just about every big state election yesterday (except for Obama’s Illinois and Connecticut), Obama won more states outright and by this morning was claiming a victory in delegates-won:

The Obama camp now projects topping Clinton by 13 delegates, 847 to 834.

NBC News, which is projecting delegates based on the Democratic Party’s complex formula, figures Obama will wind up with 840 to 849 delegates, versus 829 to 838 for Clinton.

Clinton was portrayed in many news accounts as the night’s big winner, but Obama’s campaign says he wound up with a higher total where it really counts — the delegates who will choose the party’s nominee at this summer’s Democratic convention.

So, the fun will continue …

(Mitt Romney photo credit: Joe Crimmings Photography / Some Rights Reserved)

The Short List — Tues., Jan. 15

“Wanna buy a computer?”

NH Dispatches, Day Three — drunkenness, what women really find hot and a baseball bat

From our alt-brethren at The Weekly Dig:

Day Three – ‘We’ve been drinking since we got here …’
dispatches from one pathetic presidential primary
by Chris Faraone

I promised to bring you in the back rooms and bar booths where locals, staffers, volunteers and journalists dance the pre-primary tango. We’ve been drinking since we got here, but on Saturday we hit the strip with pens drawn. While most reporters crowded in and outside of the debates at St. Anselm’s, my crew split up to cover the jamborees that campaigns host around Manchester.

I arrived at Murphy’s Tavern minutes before the Ron Paul wagon pulled in. Unlike in Boston, where bars were reluctant to change the channel from ESPN to C-SPAN when the Democratic National Convention was in town, even Manchester’s greasiest moron holes blast politics during primary week. At Murphy’s, only one screen was left on football, presumably for the drunk, loud Neanderthal who was committed to screaming over the debate.

At first, the only dissent around the room came from a peanut gallery of Huckabee supporters in the back. It was standard arbitrary cheer; like when insecure baseball fans broadcast their preference for the visiting team. The Paul people were equally obnoxious, but considering that they had the home team advantage, and that their candidate was the only Republican on stage who speaks truth – not hollow consultant scripted tag lines – they had a right to party. Their tendency to roar every time Paul got face time reminded me of when my entire family went to see my cousin’s two-second cameo in Married to the Mob.



The only Republican candidate who the Paul supporters outright booed was Romney; one guy suggested that Mitt could free America from its foreign oil habit by simply shaving his head. The group seemed to respect John McCain and, for the most part, lacked the aggressive prep school arrogance that you generally find at grand old gatherings. That’s no surprise, since Paul is more of a cheap suit Libertarian than a Brooks Brothers Republican.

I left Murphy’s near the end of the Republican debate to find a liberal bar. Ignorant as most conservatives are, lefties have them beat on closed-mindedness. As I predicted, the gather.com herd at Milly’s Tavern had no interest in the Republican debate, even though a lot of them were allegedly there to write about it. The entire scene at this party was abhorrent; in addition to how the kiddies talked through the Republicans and shushed the room for Barack and Hillary, organizers had roped off a corner for about a couple dozen bloggers to set up. Since my next dispatch will feature a heavy tirade on blog culture, I’ll hold back for now. But if anyone can explain why I have to share space, air and wi-fi signals with every post-collegiate dip with a shiny MacBook Pro and trite opinions, please enlighten me in the comment section below.

I’m sorry — did you want me to tell you about the actual debate? On the Democratic side, my only notable opinion is that Barack Obama sucks every time he gets knocked off his stump. He’s a gifted speaker, but he can’t smack the curve balls. I would have something to say about Bill Richardson and John Edwards’ performances, but since they’re unpopular amongst the college weblog crowd, I was unable to hear anything they said over all the chitchat that went down when they were talking. Well, I do have one thing: I think that Bill Richardson and Dennis Kucinich have the same hair stylist. Either that or their mothers still lick their hands and glue their bangs down with spit before they leave their houses every day.

Sunday morning called for a bowel rupturing brunch. This shouldn’t have been a problem at 11 am; most visitors were out campaigning at events, and the few yuppies back in downtown Manchester were all in line at Dunkin Donuts playing with their Blackberries. But due to the local service industry’s drastic unpreparedness, I had to walk out of three fast fooderies after not being served for several minutes.

I would have been angry about my hapless calorie hunt had it not ended with a blessing. Just when I was about to get angry, some guy with a bullhorn announced that in minutes Kucinich would be appearing at a nearby restaurant with Hollywood heavyweight Viggo Mortensen. I heart Dennis, but I was enthralled to see Viggo, who is kind of an inside joke between me and my girlfriend; not because we think he’s a bad actor or anything like that, but because of the Vanity Fair cover on which he looked like a gay porn star, and because his name is Viggo.

As it turns out, Viggo is the Goddamn man; pretty boy is the most eloquent and enlightened star endorser out here pitching. He knows issues, and he’s right: this country really is in too much trouble to not have a real leader with compassionate convictions. Too bad we never will. Since Ron Paul had been able to sneak so much progressive rhetoric into his debate appearance, and Kucinich had been excluded from the Democratic crossfire, I asked the congressman if he’d ever considered running as a Republican. He gave me an answer so strong and so passionate that for the first time I understood how he roped that stunning wife of his. The man has heart, and next to thick cocks, that’s probably the number one turn-on for most women.

The semi-homeless guy with the five-foot dreadlock at the Kucinich press conference didn’t make it to Romney’s event at Elm Street Middle School in Nashua. It’s a good thing, too, because they would have stopped him at the door. This event — billed as “Ask Mitt Anything” — was a pristine production. Mitt rode in on a cocaine white unicorn cradling a small child. Other than a red hot blonde MySpace slut with hoop earrings, everyone on stage looked like they just jumped off a page in J Crew’s winter catalogue.

I can understand why rich, simple-minded yuppies and other assorted selfish jerkoffs gravitate to Romney. He says all the optimistic economic babble, family junk and racist anti-immigration fluff they love, which is especially easy when everybody’s lobbing questions at you. Sure, you could ask Mitt anything, but only if it’s written on a cue card that gets handed to you at the rally. To the lady who got up and gave a spiel about how her and her kid have diabetes: if that’s not true I hope your husband takes your youngest daughter’s virginity with a baseball bat.

Sorry for the aggression. I should be happy that I got into the event wearing my dingy old wax coat. Not everyone was so lucky; due to a costume ban, some global warming protestors in snowman suits were denied access, as was a girl who drove from Haverhill to hold her sign. After covering Romney for three years in Massachusetts, I can attest to the metaphorical value of their non-admittance. If Mitt pulls this off, they won’t be the only ones left outside.

Two more things

  1. The Hillsborough School board can’t agree on secular vs. non-secular holidays but didn’t have any problem naming a new high school for what passes for a hero and celebrity in Tampa Bay: NY Yankees partner George Steinbrenner. The Boss was convicted of felony charges in connection with illegal campaign contributions made to Nixon in the 1970s, and he was later pardoned. The Boss has done lots of charity work in our area, no doubt, but his offer to snitch on other political wrongdoers back in the 1970s is perhaps more insightful as to whether he should have a school named after him.
  2. Why is everyone in a snit about Mitt Romney’s failure to address the wackier aspects of his religion to the exclusion of any questioning of how evangelical Christians have/would run this country (see: Bush, George W., and Huckabee, Mike)

Mitt brings his gay marriage flip-flops to Florida

The Romney campaign sent out this e-mail to Florida supporters today, under the subject line “Preserving Traditional Marriage in Florida:”

Dear Friend:

Preserving traditional marriage between a man and a woman is imperative for America’s future. Families are the building blocks of society, and we must recognize that the ideal setting for nurturing and raising children is in a home with a mother and a father.

Unfortunately, traditional marriage is under assault by liberal, activist judges in many states. I experienced this first-hand when I was Governor of Massachusetts. The Massachusetts Supreme Court, on a 4-3 vote, created a right to same-sex marriage by judicial mandate. We must prevent the same thing from happening in Florida.

As President, I will champion a Federal Marriage Amendment to protect the traditional definition of marriage as between one man and one woman. Until we have a federal solution that restores and protects our societal definition of marriage, we must continue to protect the traditional marriage relationship state by state.

In Florida, a ballot initiative has been proposed that would give constitutional protection to the definition of marriage as one man and one woman and prevent unelected activist judges from trying to invent and impose new laws that disregard the will of the people. I strongly support this initiative.

I encourage you to learn more about this important issue by visiting Florida4Marriage.org or MittRomney.com/issues/american-culture.

That in contrast to this account of a 1994 pro-gay stance he held:

Bay Windows, the Boston-based gay and lesbian newspaper, republished excerpts from an August 1994 interview the paper did with Romney during his campaign against Senator Edward M. Kennedy. In the interview, Romney said it should be up to states to decide whether to allow same-sex marriage and he criticized Republican “extremists” who imposed their positions on the party.

“People of integrity don’t force their beliefs on others, they make sure that others can live by different beliefs they may have,” Romney is quoted as saying.

… Asked about Romney’s remarks in 1994, his communications director, Eric Fehrnstrom, said in an e-mail statement: “Governor Romney believes Americans should be respectful of all people. What he opposes are the efforts by activist judges who seek to redefine the longstanding institution of marriage being between a man and a woman.”

And the revelation last year of a 1994 letter he wrote to Log Cabin Republicans in Mass:

“…a letter he sent to the Log Cabin Club of Massachusetts [said] that he would be a stronger advocate for gay rights than Senator Edward M. Kennedy, his opponent in a Senate race, in a position that stands in contrast to his current role as a champion of a state constitutional amendment banning same-sex marriage.

“We must make equality for gays and lesbians a mainstream concern,” Mr. Romney wrote in a detailed plea for the support of the club, a gay Republican organization.

Here’s some vid of Romney in 1994 addressing the idea of being more liberal on gay rights than Ted Kennedy (about halfway through, after his flip-flop on abortion);

 

The Hot Story: Romney ’steals’ the Pinellas straw poll

This morning’s THS comes from the Times, where Ron Paul’s supporters insist that the very fabric of Democracy is at stake in a dispute over voting a the Pinellas GOP straw poll before last week’s presidential debate. The Paulies turned out in more force but Mitt Romney won the vote the old-fashioned way: he paid for it. More accurately, Romney’s few supporters cast multiple votes, which was allowed under the buy-a-$20-ticket-for-each-vote format. (Sort of the way Romney “bought” the Iowa straw poll earlier this year by spending millions of dollars to “win” a pay-per-vote event that nobody even remembers today. Having lots of money goes a long way in politics.)

The Times‘ headline certainly tipped its hand on how it feels about the dispute, calling it “a snit.” But videos of the Romneyites voting again and again hit YouTube quickly and are causing a bit of stir, at least in the Paul camp. A Palm Harbor Paulie sent me his:

So today’s THS question is this: Do straw polls matter at all? Is this a travesty of politics and corruption? Or is it all just another example of politico-media masturbation?

Romney vs. Giuliani on the ‘Sanctuary Mansion’

From the just-released CNN transcript of the first part of debate:

ERNIE NARDI:  This is Ernie Nardi from Dyker Heights in Brooklyn,
New York, with a question for the ex-Mayor Giuliani.

Under your administration, as well as others, New York City was
operated as a sanctuary city, aiding and abetting illegal aliens.

NARDI:  I would like to know, if you become president of the
United States, will you continue to aid and abet the flight of illegal
aliens into this country?

COOPER:  Mayor Giuliani?

GIULIANI:  Ernie, that was a very good question.  And the reality
is that New York City was not a sanctuary city.  (OFF-MIKE) single
illegal immigrant that New York City could find that either committed
a crime or was suspected of a crime.  That was in the executive order
originally done by Ed Koch, continued by David Dinkins and then done
by me.

The reason for the confusion is, there were three areas in which
New York City made an exception.  New York City allowed the children
of illegal immigrants to go to school.  If we didn’t allow the
children of illegal immigrants to go to school, we would have had
70,000 children on the streets at a time in which New York City was
going through a massive crime wave, averaging 2,000 murders a year,
10,000 felonies a week.

The other two exceptions related to care — emergency care in the
hospital and being able to report crimes.  If we didn’t allow illegals
to report crimes, a lot of criminals would have gone free because
they’re the ones who had the information.

GIULIANI:  But, most important point is, we reported thousands
and thousands and thousands of names of illegal immigrants who
committed crimes to the immigration service.  They did not deport
them.  And what we did, the policies that we had, were necessary
because the federal policies weren’t working.

The federal policies weren’t working, stopping people coming into
the United States.  If I were president of the United States, I could
do something about that by deploying a fence, by deploying a virtual
fence, by having a BorderStat system like my COMSTAT system that
brought down crime in New York, and just stopping people from coming
in, and then having a tamper-proof ID card.

COOPER:  Time.

Governor Romney, was New York a sanctuary city?

ROMNEY:  Absolutely.  It called itself a sanctuary city.  And as
a matter of fact, when the welfare reform act that President Clinton
brought forward said that they were going to end the sanctuary policy
of New York City, the mayor actually brought a suit to maintain its
sanctuary city status.

ROMNEY:  And the idea that they reported any illegal alien that
committed a crime — how about the fact that the people who are here
illegally have violated the law?  They didn’t report everybody they
found that was here illegally.

(APPLAUSE)

And this happens to be a difference between Mayor Giuliani and
myself and probably others on this stage as well, which is we’re going
to have to recognize in this country that we welcome people here
legally.

But the mayor said — and I quote almost verbatim — which is if
you happen to be in this country in an undocumented status — and that
means you’re here illegally — then we welcome you here.  We want you
here.  We’ll protect you here.

That’s the wrong attitude.  Instead, we should say if you’re here
illegally, you should not be here.  We’re not going to give you
benefits, other than those required by the law, like health care and
education, and that’s the course we’re going to have to pursue.

COOPER:  Mayor Giuliani?

GIULIANI:  It’s unfortunate, but Mitt generally criticizes people
in a situation in which he’s had far the — worst record.

For example, in his case, there were six sanctuary cities.  He
did nothing about them.

GIULIANI:  There was even a sanctuary mansion.  At his own home,
illegal immigrants were being employed…

(APPLAUSE)
Read the rest of this entry »

The dailies on Mitt

It’s a slow news day when a lackluster town hall meeting makes 1A, but Mitt Romney managed to score that coveted spot in the St. Petersburg Times after his “Ask Mitt Anything” session Monday.

The Times ran a large picture on the front page and then a full story on the metro front. That’s no surprising given that Mitt’s main support in Tampa Bay is centered in Pinellas County, where Mayor Rick Baker holds great favor and is also the Florida Co-Chairman for the Romney campaign.

The Tampa Tribune played the story in Metro — on page 3.

The Giuliani campaign was able to wrest away a bit of Romney’s news coverage by leaking word of Rudy’s endorsement by former Tampa mayor and Florida governor Bob Martinez for the weekend Trib online. It formally released the info to the rest of the media Monday morning, eating up more of the blogosphere cycle in advance of Romney’s appearance.

Mitt doesn’t bring the heat — it was already there

In the hottest banquet room in the heart of strongly Democratic West Tampa, Republican presidential contender Mitt Romney was slick enough but didn’t go the distance in an “Ask Mitt Anything” session Monday evening.

Mired in a third-place tie (at best) in Florida, and with Fred Thompson poised to steal away a lot of his support, Romney is trying to make a move here in advance of a crucial straw vote in Ames, Iowa, on Saturday that he is expected to win. (The other major GOP contenders aren’t competing, they say.)

Romney’s Q&A lasted just six questions (one of them a softball ‘we love you how can we help you?’ finale) and about 20 minutes in La Teresita’s upstairs room. While the old diner counter at the Boliche Boulevard landmark is well known for candidate stumping, the upstairs is mostly known for its lack of adequate air conditioning that left the crowd of about 300 sweating.

As he wrapped up the questions at what seemed to be a premature point, his Florida campaign director Mandy Fletcher sidled up to the working press and conjectured that he cut things short because “it really was boiling hot up there.” Not on account of any of the audience questions, however: Two from veterans applauding Romney’s pledge to expand the military by 100,000 recruits and increase spending by as much as $50 billion a year for better equipment and veteran health care (he said he would not reinstate the draft); one asking if Romney would support an outside-the-box idea to move the Palestinian state to the Egyptian Sinai (he was noncommittal beyond unequivocal support for Israel); one on Social Security (he supported the Bush plan and criticized Democrats for not taking it up); and one on the Fair Tax (he isn’t wild about the idea of a national sales tax to replace the income tax).

Nothing on his late-to-the-Party conversions against abortion and gay rights. Or his Mormonism’s affect on his political outlook. Or even about his garments.

Read the rest of this entry »

Go South, young man

As part of CL’s ongoing series of stories on all the major presidential candidates, this week we look at former Olympic chief and Mass governor Mitt Romney through the eyes (and wallets) of his Tampa Bay backers.

Here’s an excerpt:

The host list for Mitt Romney’s $1,000-a-head June fundraiser in St. Petersburg was most noticeable for its fascinating blend of faiths — both the deity-based kind and those who worship more at the altar of capitalism.

There were the prominent Jewish leaders from Pinellas. There were the Southern Baptists. There was the founder of Outback Steakhouses. There was one of the founders of the Hooters chain. (You decide whether that’s a business or a religion.) There was a major Florida State University Seminoles booster. (Ditto.)

Then there was the candidate: the first Mormon to be in contention for his party’s nomination for the presidency.

Toss in a few Evangelical Christian Romney-backers and the scene would have looked like a Photoshopped mash-up of an interfaith council session and a chamber of commerce meeting. Romney has benefited from influential backers in this state, thanks in no small part to inheriting a large chunk of Jeb Bush’s statewide money network and top political operatives. Bush has not publicly endorsed Romney or anyone in the race.

Read the full story here.

(Illustration by Joseph Di Nicola)

And this is why the GOP won’t win the presidency

Two leading Republican candidates in a struggle over which one is more conservative on the issue of stem-cell research.

In one corner is John McCain, the former maverick turned uninteresting grouch whose campaign is distributing video clips of one of his rivals appearing to accept some levels of embryonic stem cell funding and research. McCain’s campaign is understandably nervous, because the war hero senator is dropping like a rock in polling and can’t survive the imminent arrival of the Rear Admiral (Fred Thompson).

In the other corner is serial position-changer Mitt Romney, who has won many social conservative hearts and minds despite previous stances that were less-than-conservative. In this case, according to the NYT, McCain doesn’t appear to have the goods on Romney; the video has enough wiggle room in it for Romney’s campaign to make the argument that he hasn’t changed in his opposition to destroying fetuses to enable stem cell research.

Of course, it is not even part of the battle that both men’s positions are out of the mainstream for the nation as a whole.  But then again, this isn’t about the nation as a whole; it’s about winning the Republican primary. Plenty of time to “nuance” a position in the General Election.

Morning Roundup

Great weather outside. Good day to sneak in a cigar:

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

SEARCH