<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Screen on the Green, 2008</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/popsmart/2008/04/09/screen-on-the-green-2008/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/popsmart/2008/04/09/screen-on-the-green-2008/</link>
	<description>OMIGOD!! a Creative Loafing A&#38;E Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 04:50:54 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Larry</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/popsmart/2008/04/09/screen-on-the-green-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-952</link>
		<dc:creator>Larry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 18:53:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/popsmart/2008/04/09/screen-on-the-green-2008/#comment-952</guid>
		<description>The last movie should be Footloose for sure.  Any Hitchcock would be better than Big Momma&#039;s House.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last movie should be Footloose for sure.  Any Hitchcock would be better than Big Momma&#8217;s House.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Curt Holman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/popsmart/2008/04/09/screen-on-the-green-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-950</link>
		<dc:creator>Curt Holman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 20:02:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/popsmart/2008/04/09/screen-on-the-green-2008/#comment-950</guid>
		<description>Oh, I wouldn&#039;t imply that &#039;Jaws&#039; was anything less than a classic. When I said &quot;no vintage classic,&quot; however, I was thinking of something from the studio era. Sometimes I feel like many contemporary moviegoers think that anything earlier than &#039;Jaws&#039; and &#039;Star Wars&#039; is ancient cinematic history.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I wouldn&#8217;t imply that &#8216;Jaws&#8217; was anything less than a classic. When I said &#8220;no vintage classic,&#8221; however, I was thinking of something from the studio era. Sometimes I feel like many contemporary moviegoers think that anything earlier than &#8216;Jaws&#8217; and &#8216;Star Wars&#8217; is ancient cinematic history.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eugene</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/popsmart/2008/04/09/screen-on-the-green-2008/comment-page-1/#comment-949</link>
		<dc:creator>Eugene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 03:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/popsmart/2008/04/09/screen-on-the-green-2008/#comment-949</guid>
		<description>No classic thriller?  I don&#039;t know.  Jaws is almost a 35-year-old movie at this point, so I&#039;d consider it a classic.  There may be no hard and fast rule on this, but it does make me wonder: how old does a movie need to be before it can be considered a &quot;classic?&quot;

(Just as a reference point, here&#039;s something to consider:  Jaws is now 33 yrs old.  When it came out, surely people would&#039;ve considered a 33 year old movie like Casablanca a classic, wouldn&#039;t they?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No classic thriller?  I don&#8217;t know.  Jaws is almost a 35-year-old movie at this point, so I&#8217;d consider it a classic.  There may be no hard and fast rule on this, but it does make me wonder: how old does a movie need to be before it can be considered a &#8220;classic?&#8221;</p>
<p>(Just as a reference point, here&#8217;s something to consider:  Jaws is now 33 yrs old.  When it came out, surely people would&#8217;ve considered a 33 year old movie like Casablanca a classic, wouldn&#8217;t they?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
