Tbt* misfires
November 7th, 2007 by Wade Tatangelo in News
Tbt* News Editor Josh Korr knew he’d likely damage local rapper Black Reign’s rep with today’s cover. The snarky headline — “Street Cred? Shot! — humiliated the 24-year-old rhymer who resides and works an office job in Brandon. The St. Petersburg Times-owned tabloid regularly uses such tactics to move papers. But today the free daily went too far by applying a double standard to hardcore rappers like Black Reign that doesn’t exist for other artists in the business of depicting violence. Furthermore, the headline misrepresents the actual story.
The article’s author is St. Pete Times staff reporter Ben Montgomery. He writes and files his stories; an editor crafts the headline. On the Times’ version of Montgomery’s article about Black Reign, which ran on the bottom of today’s front page, the headline reads: “A sudden reality check,” keeping in line with the thrust of the piece. Not so with the headline Tbt* ran on its cover, with a picture that shows Black Reign looking much more threatening than the headshot that ran in the Times. (Both images were lifted from the rapper’s MySpace site.)
“I thought this was a really fine moment of honesty,†Montgomery said in an interview. “I really felt it was a gift from the guy. He was being candid about a real and scary situation that stands in contrast to the things he [raps] about.
“If you look at this story the way it was in the [Times], there’s complexity. In a vacuum, it’s a complex story about the reality of violence. It certainly doesn’t make fun of him.â€
Black Reign is shown on the cover of Tbt* scowling and pointing menacingly with his left index finger. Under the “Street cred? Shot!” headline, the subhead reads: “Local rapper Black Reign is best known for his song ‘Gun Shine State.’ On stage recently, he heard a sound for the first time: a gunshot. He ran and hid in the ladies room.”
Did Montgomery feel betrayed by the Tbt* headline?
“Not a sense of betrayal, necessarily,†he responded. “In all my reporting, I try to establish a level of trust with the sources. It’s a hard enough thing to do without someone wondering if they’re going to be made fun of.â€
Did Montgomery feel the headline was sensationalized?
“I’m not sure that’s the right word,†he said. “I think if anything, the headline wasn’t reported. In my view, it doesn’t fit this story. There’s nothing in there about [Black Reign’s] street cred. It would be different if we would have had fans talking about how this admission affects his career — but that’s not really what this story was about.â€
Tbt*’s headline mocks Black Reign for not acting like the characters he depicts in song. He’s ridiculed for being a phony. For being scared — as if in order for him to rap about shooting someone, he had to have actually done it, as if he should have pulled out his gat and returned fire that night several weeks ago in the Brandon nightclub called Fluid. The night a 36-year-old mother was shot and murdered.
I asked Tbt* News Editor Josh Korr, who wrote the headline, if it reflects the essence of Montgomery’s story. “I think it does,†he said, “I didn’t listen to the song [“Gun Shine State.â€] I’m not familiar with his canon. I went to his MySpace and the song wasn’t there. But I found something you guys wrote.â€
Korr refers to the critic’s award Creative Loafing gave Black Reign in our September Best of the Bay issue. It was a humorous entry (or at least a stab at humor) I did titled “Best Song to Play for Prospective Transplants.†While on the phone with me, Korr read back one of the lines I wrote: “…the ultra-violent single by hardcore rapper Black Reign. The song finds the Tampa Heights native threatening would-be rivals with bodily harm via his firearm.â€
I told Korr that I was the one who wrote it. (Best of the Bay items do not have bylines.) He stopped quoting my words mid-sentence and continued with his defense of the headline: “I’m not familiar with all of his work … But a main aspect … He has some songs about violence and once again it’s a hip-hop artist and it’s all about posturing. That’s what the headline [reflects].â€
I mentioned to Korr that Tbt* music writer Julie Garisto did a mini-profile on Black Reign that ran in June. In it, the man born Anthony Blocker never alludes to being a real life gangsta. “We’re killing ourselves over who’s the best or who’s tougher,†Black Reign said in Garisto’s piece. “You never hear about Michelangelo or Leonardo da Vinci arguing over who was the best painter. Hip-hop is a craft. People need to come together if it’s to grow.â€
Korr said he didn’t think of Garisto’s story when it came time to write the headline. “It ran six months ago,†he said.
“I shot a man in Reno just to watch him die,” sang Johnny Cash in his famous hit “Folsom Prison Blues.”
Cash never set foot in Folsom Prison — other than to perform there after he was famous. He never shot a man. It was understood that Cash was an entertainer — that even though he was singing from the first-person perspective and wrote the song, it wasn’t about him.
When Cash’s Jamaican holiday home was broken into, and he was held at gunpoint with his family, the media didn’t respond by mocking him for not pulling out his own gun. Likewise, no one expects Martin Scorsese to be a tough guy because he makes movies about tough guys. I asked Korr if he would have mocked a macho country singer like Cash if he had been in the same awful situation as Black Reign found himself recently. I asked if hip-hop artist are being held to a double standard.
“That’s a larger cultural issue that a headline cannot address,†Korr said. “I’m going back to your quote and his lyrics: He’s putting on a persona; it’s fair to poke a hole in that persona.
“If there’s a second thought,†Korr concluded. “It’s because someone died in the shooting.â€
On Oct. 18, the Times ran an extensive story about the murder that took place at Fluid Lounge and Nightclub. Today’s Black Reign piece was a human-interest follow-up, a microcosmic look at what can happen to individuals in times of crisis. It was sensitive, not mocking. That it got handed over to the tabloid and turned into something tawdry is a shame. That a local rapper trying to carve out a career now has to answer doubts about his street cred, has to answer for what was characterized as a cowardly act, is patently unfair.
Korr said he was not aware of the Times news story about the murder. “As far as I know,†he said. “There wasn’t [one].â€
There was.
Black Reign sounded weary when I phoned him around 3:30 p.m.
“How’s it going?†I asked.
“Not good,†he said despondently.
The rapper explained that I would have to call him back after 5:30 p.m., after he got off work. I did. The young man sounded worse, explained he’d been on the phone all day, said he wanted to do the interview in person, perhaps tomorrow. I said it needed to be done ASAP. I gave him my number. He said he’d call me back in 20 minutes. I tried him again around 6:30. No answer. Voice mailbox: full.
Send to a friend:







November 8th, 2007 at 1:22 pm
This really seems to be an unfortunate trend, and I’m not sure why the Times of all papers is latching into this. The tabloid sensationalist crap has got to go, and there are even writers for the regular paper who only seem interested in exploiting personal tragedy. Pretty disgusting, actually.
November 8th, 2007 at 2:31 pm
great job on this tale, Wade. both in terms of the people involved and the institutions. tbt* is often a disgrace to journalism, and I’ve heard privately from several Times staffers who have been aghast at the covers/headlines that have gone over the line.
Montgomery makes an important point in his quotes: it is about context. The broadsheet Times seems to really care about carefully putting stories into context; tbt* wants to push tabloids, context be damned.
November 8th, 2007 at 2:47 pm
I’ve seen some stuff in tbt* that was so tasteless and sensationalist that I assumed there weren’t any editors, since no editor should have let that stuff run. I guess there are editors at tbt* after all, just no better than the staff writers.
November 8th, 2007 at 3:50 pm
sheesh…this manufactured dust-up about an edgy headline is pretty funny to anyone old enough to remember when the local weekly tabloids saw it as their mission to push the envelope.
now, we have the corporate-controlled creative loafing huffing and puffing about an over-the-top editorial decision in the nowadays more independent big city daily.
have i fallen down a rabbit hole?
November 8th, 2007 at 8:36 pm
Props for the straight dope Tatangelo. Right on.
November 9th, 2007 at 11:56 am
great job, Wade!!!!! the tbt’s portrayal of Mr. Reign was aweful. the tbt does call itself a tabloid and says that they use sensationalized headlines to move papers. i’ve heard this come right out of the mouth the their top dog… in person… while at his house. really. as far as the comment from ‘dreaming’: “the corporate-controlled creative loafing “… WTF? maybe they should stop by our corporate headquarters on a friday around 4pm…
November 9th, 2007 at 3:30 pm
Eric D. thinks you’re a little off base.
http://blogs.tampabay.com/media/2007/11/deconstructing-.html
November 9th, 2007 at 3:43 pm
They don’t write their own stuff at TBT. All of the stories are picked up the day before on FARK.COM and their ‘writers’ just sift through the fark comments and reprint them ….the entire paper is plagiarized.
November 15th, 2007 at 12:50 pm
I couldn’t help but notice that you somehow “forgot” to mention in this commentary that Black Reign is a member of the Umbrella Corporation, as is Durium “Deacon” Jones, who (by pure coincidence?) is (or at least was, at one point in time) employed by Creative Loafing as a Marketing Director. So much for full disclosure.
November 15th, 2007 at 1:15 pm
It’s a damn shame that it even made it on the cover. Who care’s about this no talent rapping ass dude. Dude does shows beside a golden coral? He’s making big moves on the fried chicken.
November 15th, 2007 at 2:29 pm
Dration:
We disclosed that Durium worked here in my Umbrella Corporation cover story. This article was about tbt* and Black Reign, not the network to which he belongs. Plus, by the time I wrote this piece Durium was no longer employed here.
Here’s the link:
http://tampa.creativeloafing.com/gyrobase/Content?oid=oid%3A301584
November 15th, 2007 at 6:50 pm
Wade (Mr. Tatangelo),
I’ve always noticed (and appreciated) how Wayne Garcia seems to consistently make note (sometimes even repeated note if it’s something he’s written about before) in his columns about his past associations/friendships/relationships or employment whenever he’s writing about something where even the possibility of “conflict of interest” might rear it’s head. I admire his honesty. Whether or not Mr. Jones still works for Creative Loafing might not relate to this story in your view, but from my perspective, including that fact (regardless of it’s having been in a past issue) would have been appropriate. You say not. Okie-Dokie. You’re the journalist, not me.
November 16th, 2007 at 10:34 am
dration:
I make these decisions with my editors. They’re not made lightly.
For instance, four/five years ago I was a freelance music writer for the St. Petersburg Times. My editor David Warner noted this in an introductory piece when I started at Creative Loafing in February. Should have this been disclosed again when I wrote about the Times-owned tbt*? We didn’t think it was necessary.
Your thoughts?