<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Dent knew of potential problems last August</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/</link>
	<description>The blog of the Suncoast</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 07:48:07 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cooper Levey-Baker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/comment-page-1/#comment-29548</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooper Levey-Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/#comment-29548</guid>
		<description>Thanks for checking out our Dent coverage, Texxs; can you believe she got re-elected?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for checking out our Dent coverage, Texxs; can you believe she got re-elected?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: texxs</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/comment-page-1/#comment-29541</link>
		<dc:creator>texxs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/#comment-29541</guid>
		<description>Jack said:&quot;The computers worked flawlessly&quot;

Where on earth did you hear that?

Are you joking or some kind of repub-a-bot?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack said:&#8221;The computers worked flawlessly&#8221;</p>
<p>Where on earth did you hear that?</p>
<p>Are you joking or some kind of repub-a-bot?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Francis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/comment-page-1/#comment-294</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 20:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/#comment-294</guid>
		<description>I thought we did find out what happened. The computers worked flawlessly.

However, the design of the ballot was confusing to some -- just like some people were confused in Bush-Gore -- they thought that voting for both candidates counted as a vote for Gore --  or that pushing a chad all the way through for Bush, and partially the way through  for Gore counted as a vote for Gore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought we did find out what happened. The computers worked flawlessly.</p>
<p>However, the design of the ballot was confusing to some &#8212; just like some people were confused in Bush-Gore &#8212; they thought that voting for both candidates counted as a vote for Gore &#8212;  or that pushing a chad all the way through for Bush, and partially the way through  for Gore counted as a vote for Gore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cooper Levey-Baker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/comment-page-1/#comment-290</link>
		<dc:creator>Cooper Levey-Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:33:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/#comment-290</guid>
		<description>Jack, I voted for Jennings, so you might think this tainted, but I want to simply find out what happened, even if we agree beforehand that regardless of the outcome, we won&#039;t retroactively remove Buchanan and install Jennings. Why is that ridiculous? Isn&#039;t it worth taking the time and money to get it right next time?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack, I voted for Jennings, so you might think this tainted, but I want to simply find out what happened, even if we agree beforehand that regardless of the outcome, we won&#8217;t retroactively remove Buchanan and install Jennings. Why is that ridiculous? Isn&#8217;t it worth taking the time and money to get it right next time?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack Francis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/comment-page-1/#comment-287</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack Francis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Mar 2007 13:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/#comment-287</guid>
		<description>While we&#039;re at it, why not re-count Bush-Gore 2000. Other possible re-counts could include Humphry-Nixon &quot;68, and Kennedy-Nixon &#039;62. After these re-counts are finished, it would be cool to see the losing side demand another re-count -- then the side that came out on the losing end of that re-re-count could challenge the outcome all the way to the Supreme Court.

I almost forgot Bush-Kerry 2004, and their controversial Ohio primary result. A re-count is definitely in order there.

Here in Florida, it&#039;s good that we not longer use the &quot;punch cards&quot; that we used in the 2000 Presidential election, and I hope that we will no longer use the &quot;touch screen &quot; machines that were used in the 2006 election. 

Whatever the next method of voting is, if my side doesn&#039;t come out on top --I wanna recount!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While we&#8217;re at it, why not re-count Bush-Gore 2000. Other possible re-counts could include Humphry-Nixon &#8220;68, and Kennedy-Nixon &#8216;62. After these re-counts are finished, it would be cool to see the losing side demand another re-count &#8212; then the side that came out on the losing end of that re-re-count could challenge the outcome all the way to the Supreme Court.</p>
<p>I almost forgot Bush-Kerry 2004, and their controversial Ohio primary result. A re-count is definitely in order there.</p>
<p>Here in Florida, it&#8217;s good that we not longer use the &#8220;punch cards&#8221; that we used in the 2000 Presidential election, and I hope that we will no longer use the &#8220;touch screen &#8221; machines that were used in the 2006 election. </p>
<p>Whatever the next method of voting is, if my side doesn&#8217;t come out on top &#8211;I wanna recount!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. Manckles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/comment-page-1/#comment-245</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. Manckles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Mar 2007 22:43:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.creativeloafing.com/the941/2007/03/13/dent-knew-of-potential-problems-last-august/#comment-245</guid>
		<description>I think we are ignoring the obvious fix - job sharing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think we are ignoring the obvious fix &#8211; job sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
