For this specific article conservatives are more likely to have a well rounded news background and yet this writer implies just the opposite. There was a survey on this a year or so ago.

This writer leaves facts that dont help her case out all the time so she either is quilty of the very thing she is writting about or guilty of intenionaly leaving information out to sway readers.

Uninformed opinions are not fit for public consumption. An informed article would get praise from me or very little if any response. Just think of my comments as a word from the ombudsman who is here to clean up any mess the writers create.

I could do better than most on CL but CL already has a token smart person named Tara.

Again, you’re confusing this blog — where opinion are OK — with the news.

Why are you always bugging CL’s writers, anyway?

And, what “important information” is the author leaving out? Do enlighten us, Frank, since you seem to think you’re so much smarter than everyone else.

Seriously, Frank, if you think you can do better, why don’t you blog for Creative Loafing?

If Bowman would notice, many of my problems with her reporting is that she leaves important information out inorder to sway people to her side. Since she leaves inportant information out many times it would appear that she is the one lacking a well rounded information background.

Manhy liberal voters suffer from what Bowman describes in this article. The only problem is that they only watch NBC or CBS.

FOX is the #1 cable news outlet but it will take years before tha majority of people quit watch the network news outlets. Non biased news is still where most people stuck in their ways still get news.

The topic of the article was good. The execution was terrible.