Billions of dollars in health-related damages not included in price of energy

October 27th, 2009 by Rhiannon Bowman in Biz, News

Maybe we should get big polluters to fund health care reform? You know: Two birds. One stone.

From Chemical and Engineering News:

Fossil-fuel-based energy production, mostly from coal and oil, causes $120 billion worth of health and other non-climate-related damages in the U.S. each year that are not figured into the price of energy, says a National Research Council report released last week.

The dollar amount is primarily based on health impacts and premature deaths of nearly 20,000 people annually that result from air pollution generated by coal-fired electric power plants and motor vehicles. Specifically, the report looked at damages caused by emissions of sulfur dioxide, particulates, and nitrogen oxides.

Using life-cycle analyses, the study finds that nearly all of the $120 billion in damages is due to electricity generation ($63 billion) and transportation fuel production and use ($56 billion), says Jared L. Cohon, committee chairman and president of Carnegie Mellon University. The remaining $1 billion is due to heating. But the total is conservative, he continues, because it does not reflect the impact of climate change, harm to ecosystems, or the effect of toxic air pollutants, such as mercury or lead.

Most of the $63 billion in damages attributed to electricity comes from coal-fired power plants, which produce half the nation’s electricity. Nearly half of these damages come from emissions by 10% of the dirtiest coal plants—the U.S. has some 406 such plants. The report also finds that although natural gas generates 20% of U.S. electricity, it contributes only about $1 billion in health and non-climate-related damages.

For transportation, the report finds that damages total some $56 billion from vehicles and motor fuels over their full life cycles, from extraction to refining to use in a vehicle. Most of the damage costs come from extraction and production, and only one-third are due to motor vehicle operation.

The 19-member report panel of economists found that damages from corn-grain-based biofuels are similar to or slightly worse than those from gasoline because of energy needed to produce and convert corn to fuel. But for ethanol from cellulosic feedstock, the damages drop.

The panel could not tightly tie down climate-change impacts, and the report finds a wide range of damage costs due to carbon dioxide emissions—between $1.00 and $100 per ton. Considering the size of U.S. CO2 emissions, this works out to $7 billion to $700 billion in annual damages from greenhouse gas emissions.

In related news: Coal companies spend big to influence climate change bill and Coal industry protections drafted into climate change bill

Blog Widget by LinkWithin

3 Responses to “Billions of dollars in health-related damages not included in price of energy”

  1. Billions of dollars in health-related damages not included in price of energy - Health Articles A to Z Says:

    [...] Here is a strange post: Billions of dollars in health-related indemnification not enclosed in cost of energy [...]

  2. Billions of dollars in health-related damages not included in price of energy Says:

    [...] rest is here: Billions of dollars in health-related indemnification not enclosed in cost of energy This entry was posted in Posts about Health & Beauty and tagged arts, bad-habits, dining, [...]

  3. Frank Griffin Says:

    Talk about your continued stupid articles. The energy choices we make as a society are now going to be used as a scape goat to bilk money out of energy companies! If anything we should sue Green peace for stopping energy companies from creating nuclear power plants.

    If I were to entertain this article at all, I would let the energy companies charge what the power would have cost if they had provided it with green energy then. So basically the people would pay themselves the fine for thier own stupidity.

    Really this idea is about as bright as the Health care bill taxing medical equipment to pay for medical care! This is like taking water from one end of the pool and dumping it into the other end.

    Anyways I see the CL is just not that interested in logical thinking.

Leave a Reply

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture.
Anti-Spam Image