Open Mic Madness 2007 wrap-up
August 20th, 2007 by Mosi Reeves in Music newsLast week, Josh Rifkind, man-about-town and manager of the Whigs, asked me to be a judge at his signature event, Open Mic Madness. A six-day bonanza that’s currently in its sixth year at Smith’s Olde Bar, Open Mic Madness is a talent competition where more than 100 bands square off against each another. There are roughly 120 slots, and each act is paired into twos; both acts play a song to determine which one in the bracket advances. (This year there were fewer slots because not enough people signed up.) By Thursday, the one-song elimination cuts the talent in half, much like the NCAA tournament; there are about 32 acts left on Friday; and Saturday is the finals, with about eight acts angling for the title.
Past winners of Open Mic Madness include the Whigs, who are now signed to ATO Records (Dave Matthews’ label); and popular local acts such as Sovus Radio, Bain Mattox and last year’s champion, Dead Confederate. Because of the sheer volume of artists who participate, Open Mic Madness has earned a reputation as the most important rock contest in Atlanta.
This year, I was fortunate enough to judge on Tuesday, Friday and Saturday. Smartly, Rifkind rotates his judges, and has them work four at a time in two-hour shifts, or 16 bands apiece. So I sat on an early shift of four judges on Tuesday and Friday. On Saturday, I sat on a six-judge panel; Rifkind expanded it for the final round. This was a step up for me from last year, when I was asked only to judge early shifts on Tuesday and Friday. It is a great experience, and I usually have a good time networking with the other judges, all of whom are music industry veterans.
One would expect Open Mic Madness to be easily conquered by acts that gig regularly around town. But that’s not necessarily the case. Some of the artists who entered include Entropy, Dave Daniels, Club Awesome, Breakroom, Groovestain, Leaf Newman, Tx/Rx, Crop Circle, Morningside and Deke Spears. Some, I’m sure, fell victim to fickle judges who simply didn’t like what they heard. Others may have had an off night. For example, when I saw Entropy play Friday, the band members took way too long to set up their equipment, pissing off some judges. Then they played a rote and mechanical tune. One of the judges mentioned afterward that Entropy played more impressively earlier in the competition. (For obvious reasons, I’m not identifying any of the judges’ comments.)
Nevertheless, there were a few problems this year. One of the most common complaints I heard is that the standard of competition is not what it was in years past. I don’t know if that’s true, but I will say that most of the music reminded me that Open Mic Madness is a talent contest. A few of the acts had stage presence and looked like they were in it to win it, but most seemed happy just to be playing in front of a crowd.
I also noticed that far fewer people attended this year. I don’t have any official numbers, but I remember that on Friday it wasn’t until close to 10 p.m. — two hours after the night had started — that Smith’s Olde Bar was full of people. Last year on the same night, it was packed by 8. Meanwhile, the room never filled to capacity on Saturday, the final round of Open Mic Madness.
For me, however, the biggest issue was an overabundance of singer/songwriter acts. Just when a pair of bands would play their songs and get the crowd excited, a pair of solo artists strumming a guitar or tickling a keyboard piano would take the stage, killing the momentum. Controversially, Rifkind paired the solo acts in brackets so they only compete against each other. Conversely, bands only play against each another. The result is that a weak field of solo musicians — and many of the judges I spoke with agreed that this year’s field of singer/songwriters was notably lackluster — can still advance further than a strong crop of bands. In the final round, the best band competes against the best solo artist for the title.
The most heartbreaking example of this took place Saturday night. The quarterfinals consisted of four bands (Sealions, Friendly Strangers, the Brock Scott Quartet and the Spencer Durham Group) and four solo acts (Meghan Coffee, Tracy Hill, Sommer Melody and Erica Ambrose).
The Sealions faced off against Friendly Strangers first. I hearkened the Sealions to a figure skater moving through a routine: It was great at times, but each little mistake lessened the overall performance. But I liked the Sealions’ fresh indie-rock sound. Friendly Strangers, in contrast, played a bluesy song that was unremarkable.
Next came Tracy Hill, who gave a unique a cappella vocal, and Meghan Coffee, who had a nice, husky delivery that sometimes swayed off-key.
Then came Brock Scott Quartet versus Spencer Durham Group. The quartet impressed everyone by playing a loopy jazz-pop number. The drummer played percussion, and the bassist strummed a cello. Its performance was entertaining and mischievously light. In contrast, Spencer Durham Group powered through an over-the-top rock number. Its guitarist wailed with a solo that left the crowd clapping rapturously; one of the judges called the group’s performance “retarded.” The entire six-judge panel fretted about having to choose between the quartet and the group.
Finally came Sommer Melody, who was accompanied by a guitarist, versus Erica Ambrose, who sang while accompanying herself on piano. Melody had a great, soulful voice, but her guitarist was annoyingly capable of playing only a few repetitive notes. As for Ambrose, I had seen her the night before, and she blew me away with a heartfelt, emotional performance. But she had problems this time around. First, she stopped her song in the middle of the first verse, apparently having made a mistake. She seemed to know that the song wasn’t working, so she overcompensated with too much vocal melisma. Ambrose didn’t do well on Saturday, but she’s a promising artist, and I’m curious to see how she develops in her career.
After the eight acts played, Rifkind went on stage to announce the results. The winners were Sealions, Tracy Hill, Sommer Melody and … in a huge upset, Brock Scott Quartet. Many in the crowd were stunned that the Spencer Durham Group hadn’t won, because they gave such an amazing performance. I asked one of the judges for an opinion, and the person noted that while the Spencer Durham Group played the best, the quartet had the better overall song. I couldn’t disagree, but still felt it was too close to call.
It seemed unfair that the quartet had to face off against the group in the quarterfinals since both bands were vastly superior to the rest of the talent that night. The crowd sensed it, too. By the middle of the next round, many of them lost interest and left, leaving the room about half-full.
I think Rifkind needs to make some changes next year and, instead of allowing the solo acts to only play against other solo acts, make every act compete head-to-head. To make a comparison: If you see Chris Carrabba of Dashboard Confessional and Plain White T’s in concert, you don’t judge the two acts separately based on the technicality that Carrabba is a solo artist. You judge them both on their merits. So why segregate singer/songwriters and bands into two divisions?
If in some years, the singer/songwriters who enter Open Mic Madness aren’t as good as the bands, then bands should be allowed to dominate the competition. Other years, the opposite could happen. But keeping bands and singer/songwriters separate doesn’t make sense. It leads to an unfair advantage when, as was the case this year, the singer/songwriters are clearly inferior to the bands. Here’s hoping that Rifkind changes the format.
In the semifinal round, Tracy Hill beat out Sommer Melody despite another a cappella song that was loopy and weird. (One judge argued that at least Hill had passion, and that Melody’s song was tired and emotionless in comparison.) Then the quartet triumphed over Sealions despite reverting to a standard pop-rock four-piece, which was much less interesting than its folk-jazz incarnation during the climatic Spencer Durham Group battle. In the finale, the quartet sewed it all up.
So congratulations to the Brock Scott Quartet, winners of Open Mic Madness 2007. You can judge the group for yourself when it plays at the Earl on Tues., Sept. 11.









August 20th, 2007 at 3:52 pm
I would agree that this competition seemed off. Many acts that were eliminated early were superior to acts that progressed. But I disagree about the singer/songwriters vs. bands. This is called Open Mic Madness, which brings to my mind, singer/songwriters. Most people that I spoke to about this competition were surprised when I explained solo artists had to face off against bands. I think a band competition would be more aptly named a “Battle of the Bands”. My reasoning has less to do with fairness, and more to do with the audience. If I feel like seeing a full band, an acoustic solo act bums me out a bit. Likewise, if I go to see a solo artist, a full band might drive me away. The feel is different. I take my wife to singer/songwriter shows for a nice, relaxed evening where we can talk and hang out with a good ambience about us. I take my wife to see bands when we feel like dancing. Also of note, I felt artists who broke guitar strings got eliminated even if they sounded better than their competition. Yeah, I was one of them, but another, besides myself, clearly outperformed his competition, who sounded drunk, even though he’d busted a string. I thought he handled it like a proffessional, while his competition was slurring and pitchy. I won’t name anyone, since I like them both. Props to Josh for working hard, though. I sure wouldn’t want to be in his shoes during the madness that he created.
August 20th, 2007 at 4:50 pm
Just to clarify, singer-songwriters did not have to face off against bands. Singer-songwriters faced off against each other, and bands faced off against bands. Only in the final round did the best singer-songwriter face off against the best band. My argument is that it should be a free-for-all.
Also, I hope my criticism of the event doesn’t take away from what Josh accomplishes every year. I think it’s a fantastic competition, particularly given the size and scope of it. But that doesn’t mean it’s perfect.
August 23rd, 2007 at 7:37 pm
Yeah.. and the bassist of the brock scott quartet doesn\\\’t strum a cello… The bassist strummed a double bass…
August 23rd, 2007 at 7:46 pm
“Open Mic Madness 2007 Crap-up”
Thanks to Mosi Reeves for a little afternoon idiocy. Now everyone can be misinformed of the events that took place over Open Mic Madness.
Mosi, I hear there is an opening at AJC for Obituary Writers.
August 23rd, 2007 at 8:03 pm
Are you kidding me? you have no place writing period.
wow you would like sea lions. They arent anything new. same punk ass lack of knowledge or schooling of music whatsoever. The drummer couldnt keep time if he had a watch. What taste!!! Brock scott was very classy. Nothing new from Spencer Durham. Just old school rock and roll. Have you know the friendly strangers Played a different song every night.
August 24th, 2007 at 2:38 am
Hey Mosi, did you actually attend the event. Of course you did. I saw you..you were that pudgy, pillsbury doughboy looking dude moping around wishing you were half as musically talented as the worst act that came up on the stage. Poor Mosi!! So thank the Lord he invented pencils for you to take notes, and give a piss poor written acount of Open Mic Madness. The only thing I can really say about your review of the show is that you are annoying capable of typing…ok, and maybe spelling and forming complete sentences…but thats about it.
Lets face it Moses, your the introverted, quite, pudgy guy, that was born without any musical talent and hates those who are.(And Loves those who aren’t) And you probably got your ass kicked by a “talented musician rockstar type kid” when you were in grade school. And you are reminded of it everytime you hear/see great music/musicans.
Anyhow, if it brightens up your life, I will name my next band after you. I’ll call it “Mosi on Downers”
If you ever need guitar lessons, hit me up!!! 678.755.4885
August 24th, 2007 at 1:53 pm
Thanks to everyone for their kind comments.
And Brandon, maybe you were the bully who used to beat me up in grade school. Are you from California?
August 24th, 2007 at 7:16 pm
Seriously, though, I appreciate the feedback. I’m a little disappointed, though, that this is being turned into a “Mosi Reeves hates Open Mic Madness” thing, because that wasn’t my intention at all. Sure, I may have been heavy-handed in my dismissal of the solo acts that played that night. But I sincerely felt like the competition didn’t compare to last year’s.
Is there anyone who agrees with me, or am I alone here?
August 30th, 2007 at 10:29 am
Commenting on music is almost like commenting on religion. It is always going to result in someone being offended and firing back… I have to respect the writer’s willingness to don the musical flak jacket for expressing his opinions. I’d rather disagree with an editorial piece than have ones that say “oh my gosh, you all are so great…” and “yes please, more” all the time. Somebody needs to stir up the pot. & wow did this string degrade quickly. After the first comment, its just name calling and whining “Mosi doesnt like what I like”….. Boohoo. Become a staff writer for CL then…
I do think the format needs some segregation at a minimum in the early rounds to preserve the momentum of music. If you had Singer Songwriters up against bands in round one, wow, that would be a long round to go thru… Maybe the format would be better if the Band brackets meet the Singer Songwriters in round 3 for head to head matches and let the best move on from there?